• Joined on 2026-09-02
mi created branch claude-code/reused-comment-gets-new-text in mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 15:46:55 +02:00
mi pushed to claude-code/hints-hold-merge at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 15:28:40 +02:00
3729f3e807 review: unreadable line comments hold the merge and fail the gate check instead of releasing it
mi pushed to claude-code/hints-hold-merge at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 15:27:07 +02:00
602663aedc review: [gate] hints_hold_merge must be a boolean
mi pushed to claude-code/hints-hold-merge at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 15:26:14 +02:00
a66d56e5b0 review: a failed cancel fails the gate check; a restart comments only a change of the merge
mi pushed to claude-code/hints-hold-merge at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 15:24:28 +02:00
f11a884168 review: findings that are no line comment hold the merge too, e.g. when Gitea refused the line comments
mi pushed to claude-code/hints-hold-merge at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 15:23:19 +02:00
23983b00a6 review: a restarted review comments its gate note; a failed cancel is named in the result comment
mi pushed to claude-code/hints-hold-merge at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 15:21:56 +02:00
6732eda3b4 werkrevisor 0.20.1: open hints hold the automerge of a GREEN pull request
mi created branch claude-code/hints-hold-merge in mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 15:18:59 +02:00
mi pushed to claude-code/hints-hold-merge at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 15:18:59 +02:00
8131fe8272 docs: PR#32 doc, open hints hold the automerge of a GREEN pull request
mi pushed to claude-code/excerpt-selection at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 14:59:48 +02:00
37142cdaca review: a selection dropped by the context reduction is marked as discarded; explicit secret guard for the selection
mi pushed to claude-code/excerpt-selection at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 14:57:07 +02:00
0abde9877e review: a too large prompt first loses the full files, then the excerpts, before the review is given up
mi pushed to claude-code/excerpt-selection at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 14:54:06 +02:00
8f71589e5b review: malformed usage values make the selection cost an estimate; a secret in the diff gets no selection, tested
mi pushed to claude-code/excerpt-selection at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 14:52:33 +02:00
bdf286bf0f werkrevisor 0.20.0: a cheap model selects the excerpt of a file too large for the review model
mi pushed to claude-code/excerpt-selection at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 14:22:19 +02:00
9efc42f550 stats service counts the excerpt selection as LLM cost
mi pushed to claude-code/excerpt-selection at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 14:21:54 +02:00
53994f2efb excerpt selection by a cheap model: [excerpt] select = "model", validated line ranges, fixed window as fallback
mi pushed to claude-code/excerpt-selection at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 14:16:26 +02:00
04a319c566 docs: PR#31 doc, a cheap model selects the excerpt
48ed8eca5e fix: PR#30 hints: no stale wording about change requests, simpler review event, no duplicate test
Compare 2 commits »
mi created branch claude-code/excerpt-selection in mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 14:16:26 +02:00
mi pushed to claude-code/no-stale-change-request at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 14:10:04 +02:00
376f6f582e werkrevisor 0.19.3: a RED review no longer blocks later commits