mi

0 Followers · 0 Following

• Joined on 2026-09-02

Repositories

10

Projects Packages Public Activity Starred Repositories

mi pushed to claude-code/statistics-directory at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:59:15 +02:00

537b48abb2 review: a test covers the WERKREVISOR_STATISTICS_* placeholders; the host config is no scenario of this repository

mi pushed to claude-code/statistics-directory at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:55:48 +02:00

8c244e0f60 werkrevisor 0.20.3: the statistics service is called statistics, not server

mi pushed to claude-code/statistics-directory at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:54:27 +02:00

dc84cd3fd1 docs: PR#34 doc, the statistics service is called statistics, not server

mi created branch claude-code/statistics-directory in mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:54:27 +02:00

mi approved mi/werkrevisor#33 2026-10-06 16:50:22 +02:00

werkrevisor 0.20.2: a reused line comment gets the text of the new review

mi pushed to claude-code/reused-comment-gets-new-text at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:50:06 +02:00

d9b659a7e9 review: Scenario#33.05 covers the open and the resolved hint, as its two tests do

mi pushed to claude-code/reused-comment-gets-new-text at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:38:47 +02:00

aa33df41af review: a GREEN review refused with HTTP 500 approves without line comments, tested

mi pushed to claude-code/reused-comment-gets-new-text at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:37:10 +02:00

c3ad49e96a review: Scenario#33.07 no longer claims a second COMMENT review

mi pushed to claude-code/reused-comment-gets-new-text at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:35:52 +02:00

0fcbb0f971 review: Scenario#33.07 names the answer of Gitea as event, as its test does

mi pushed to claude-code/reused-comment-gets-new-text at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:34:29 +02:00

eeb79347d9 review: Scenario#33.07 starts from the finding, not from the answer of Gitea

mi pushed to claude-code/reused-comment-gets-new-text at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:32:54 +02:00

a356441634 review: an open reply to an open hint is no second hint; Scenario#33.07 with one role per step

mi pushed to claude-code/reused-comment-gets-new-text at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:30:59 +02:00

3d0fbbc2aa review: HTTP 500 on line comments counts as refusal; a request listed only as review is withdrawn too

mi pushed to claude-code/reused-comment-gets-new-text at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:28:14 +02:00

308b44ee1d review: the PR#33 doc names the defects found in its reviews in the problem, not in the solution

mi pushed to claude-code/reused-comment-gets-new-text at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:26:34 +02:00

08ecc13cbb review: the review request is withdrawn only after a scheduled merge; Scenario#33.06 with one role per step

mi pushed to claude-code/reused-comment-gets-new-text at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:24:13 +02:00

dfd5f6972d review: a GREEN review that schedules the merge withdraws the review request of an earlier round

mi pushed to claude-code/reused-comment-gets-new-text at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:08:46 +02:00

f572e656d1 review: Scenario#33.01 with concrete texts, the reply case split into Scenario#33.04 and #33.05

mi pushed to claude-code/reused-comment-gets-new-text at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:07:31 +02:00

c2043deb92 review: a reply in the thread of a bot line comment is neither reused nor an open hint

mi pushed to claude-code/reused-comment-gets-new-text at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 16:04:21 +02:00

704fd0bbc0 review: line endings and trailing blanks from Gitea are no change of a reused line comment

mi pushed to claude-code/reused-comment-gets-new-text at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 15:49:10 +02:00

a0bffc1408 werkrevisor 0.20.2: a reused line comment gets the text of the new review

mi created branch claude-code/reused-comment-gets-new-text in mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 15:46:55 +02:00