a diagram shows how a pull request gets merged with werkrevisor #58
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: mi/werkrevisor#58
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
See the PR document.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for
9dd12f7, superseded by the result for2d47bbf🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind:
docs_only.Reasons
Classifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 3862, calls 1, tokens in 3831 / out 4274 (reasoning included in out), duration 30.1 s, cost 0.0062 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2737, cost 0.0001 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 7893 / out 425, cost 0.0028 USD (reported), phases: classifier 0.4 s, change_summary 3.9 s, context 0.1 s, model_review 25.4 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main73c88c6).Reviewed head `9dd12f7c5d5e641eba636f3337a57a8a940f7e9d` against base `73c88c68c2490d503932b962c16a2a25160eb330`, werkrevisor 0.27.1.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
9dd12f7c5d5e641eba636f3337a57a8a940f7e9d.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
@@ -192,0 +193,4 @@<picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="docs/werkrevisor-pr-workflow-dark.svg"><img src="docs/werkrevisor-pr-workflow.svg" alt="How a pull request gets merged with werkrevisor: lanes for the author, werkrevisor, a human reviewer and Gitea">Writing rule: line longer than 128 characters (163) (werkrevisor writing rule)
Fix the line, or reply why it stays, and resolve this comment.
Fixed: the img tag is split over two lines, so no line of the README section is longer than 128 characters.
New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for
2d47bbf, superseded by the result fored1a4fa🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind:
docs_only.Reasons
Findings
docs/prs/2026-10-08-PR#58-pr-workflow-diagram.md:25-26, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line commentClassifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 4424, calls 1, tokens in 4361 / out 3910 (reasoning included in out), duration 40.3 s, cost 0.0060 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2840, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 1124, cost 0.0000 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 18909 / out 659, cost 0.0064 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 4500, cost 0.0002 USD, phases: classifier 0.2 s, change_summary 6.2 s, doc_check 0.3 s, context 0.1 s, model_review 33.0 s, finding_judge 0.3 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main73c88c6).Reviewed head `2d47bbf90c833565e844dabcc06208d099453d51` against base `73c88c68c2490d503932b962c16a2a25160eb330`, werkrevisor 0.27.1.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
2d47bbf90c833565e844dabcc06208d099453d51.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
@@ -0,0 +22,4 @@with lanes for the author, werkrevisor, a human reviewer and Gitea, in a light and a dark variant.It shows the steps from the branch with its PR document to the merge, the consequence of each verdict,the rounds of new commits, and three measured facts.- docs/werkrevisor-review-inside.svg and its dark variant: the inside of one review, from the same view;Unclear Phrasing, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.68, severity 1.0 of 3
The phrase "from the same view" in the second bullet of "The Solution" is ambiguous; the reader has to guess whether it means the same visual style, perspective, or scope as the preceding PR workflow diagram. A concrete reference (e.g. "in the same 16:9 hand-drawn style") would make the intent clear.
Fixed: the bullet now says "in the same 16:9 style".
New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Change kind:
docs_only.Reasons
Classifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 4428, calls 1, tokens in 4365 / out 3582 (reasoning included in out), duration 39.6 s, cost 0.0048 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2845, cost 0.0001 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 18909 / out 924, cost 0.0022 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 4737, cost 0.0002 USD, phases: classifier 0.3 s, change_summary 7.5 s, doc_check 0.3 s, context 0.1 s, model_review 31.1 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main73c88c6).Reviewed head `ed1a4fa1732cd73afd90f90e241b6a606d00815f` against base `73c88c68c2490d503932b962c16a2a25160eb330`, werkrevisor 0.27.1.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
ed1a4fa1732cd73afd90f90e241b6a606d00815f.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.