[model] provider_order and [doc_check] provider_order pass an order of OpenRouter providers,
with fallbacks; the usage record names the provider of the change summary. The MiniMax configs
ask the maker of the model first, since some providers hang.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ai-review/assessment AI review passed; approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind: mixed.
Reasons
hint 9 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks nor touch security according to Jev
hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
hint 7 section(s) of the PR document agree with the change summary of openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 according to Jev
hint 1 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-08-PR#56-provider-order.md:18
Findings
Unclear Non-Goal at docs/prs/2026-10-08-PR#56-provider-order.md:18, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line comment
Classifier
7 of 7 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
3 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 49207, calls 1, tokens in 47331 / out 13825 (reasoning included in out), duration 712.4 s, cost 0.0284 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 7, tokens in 5580, cost 0.0002 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 1297, cost 0.0001 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` calls 1, tokens in 3954 / out 1561, cost 0.0030 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 7, tokens in 12065, cost 0.0005 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 10, tokens in 6935, cost 0.0003 USD, phases: path_judge 0.7 s, classifier 0.5 s, change_summary 8.6 s, doc_check 0.5 s, context 0.5 s, model_review 700.8 s, finding_judge 0.4 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 73bb6f6).
Reviewed head `67db1767bfe66950e2a51e537f49bdacd7ef447a` against base `73bb6f6c209c8be3b21db42e76abeccdbbb3453d`, werkrevisor 0.26.0.
<!-- werkrevisor:67db1767bfe66950e2a51e537f49bdacd7ef447a -->
<!-- werkrevisor-verdict:GREEN -->
<!-- werkrevisor-folded -->
<details><summary>🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for <code>67db176</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/56#issuecomment-2129">the result for <code>6243a8d</code></a></summary>
## 🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind: `mixed`.
### Reasons
- **hint** 9 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks nor touch security according to Jev
- **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
- **hint** 7 section(s) of the PR document agree with the change summary of openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 according to Jev
- **hint** 1 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-08-PR#56-provider-order.md:18
### Findings
1. **Unclear Non-Goal** at `docs/prs/2026-10-08-PR#56-provider-order.md:18`, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line comment
### Classifier
7 of 7 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
3 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
<sub>
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 49207, calls 1, tokens in 47331 / out 13825 (reasoning included in out), duration 712.4 s, cost 0.0284 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 7, tokens in 5580, cost 0.0002 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 1297, cost 0.0001 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` calls 1, tokens in 3954 / out 1561, cost 0.0030 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 7, tokens in 12065, cost 0.0005 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 10, tokens in 6935, cost 0.0003 USD, phases: path_judge 0.7 s, classifier 0.5 s, change_summary 8.6 s, doc_check 0.5 s, context 0.5 s, model_review 700.8 s, finding_judge 0.4 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 73bb6f6).<br>
Reviewed head `67db1767bfe66950e2a51e537f49bdacd7ef447a` against base `73bb6f6c209c8be3b21db42e76abeccdbbb3453d`, werkrevisor 0.26.0.
</sub>
</details>
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for 67db1767bfe66950e2a51e537f49bdacd7ef447a.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `67db1767bfe66950e2a51e537f49bdacd7ef447a`.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
<!-- werkrevisor-review:67db1767bfe66950e2a51e537f49bdacd7ef447a -->
Unclear Non-Goal, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.75, severity 1.2 of 3
The Non-Goal "No provider for the excerpt selection: its model is another one" is ambiguous. The excerpt selection uses the same OpenRouterSelector class that supports provider_order via _routing, but ExcerptConfig does not have a provider_order field. The actual reason for not adding provider_order to excerpt is that ExcerptConfig lacks the field (and the PR only measured provider issues for MiniMax M3), not because "its model is another one". A reader might wonder why a different model would preclude provider_order.
**Unclear Non-Goal**, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.75, severity 1.2 of 3
The Non-Goal "No provider for the excerpt selection: its model is another one" is ambiguous. The excerpt selection uses the same `OpenRouterSelector` class that supports `provider_order` via `_routing`, but `ExcerptConfig` does not have a `provider_order` field. The actual reason for not adding `provider_order` to excerpt is that `ExcerptConfig` lacks the field (and the PR only measured provider issues for MiniMax M3), not because "its model is another one". A reader might wonder why a different model would preclude `provider_order`.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for 6243a8dc6625822cdf68d347b666a1dfc8dffb61.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `6243a8dc6625822cdf68d347b666a1dfc8dffb61`.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
<!-- werkrevisor-review:6243a8dc6625822cdf68d347b666a1dfc8dffb61 -->
ai-reviewer
scheduled this pull request to auto merge when all checks succeed 2026-10-08 18:41:47 +02:00
ai-reviewer
removed review request for mi 2026-10-08 18:41:47 +02:00
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
See the PR document.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
🟡 werkrevisor YELLOW for
80b5413, superseded by the result for67db176🟡 werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
Classifier
7 of 7 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 49221, calls 1, tokens in 47356 / out 16446 (reasoning included in out), duration 144.5 s, cost 0.0339 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 7, tokens in 5580, cost 0.0002 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` calls 1, tokens in 3992 / out 764, cost 0.0017 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 7, tokens in 11435, cost 0.0005 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 10, tokens in 6981, cost 0.0003 USD, phases: path_judge 0.8 s, classifier 0.8 s, change_summary 30.9 s, doc_check 0.5 s, context 0.4 s, model_review 110.8 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main1 answer ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
73bb6f6).Reviewed head `80b54136f9a5efc2fad086f685637e595d274d35` against base `73bb6f6c209c8be3b21db42e76abeccdbbb3453d`, werkrevisor 0.26.0.
🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for
67db176, superseded by the result for6243a8d🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
Findings
docs/prs/2026-10-08-PR#56-provider-order.md:18, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line commentClassifier
7 of 7 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 49207, calls 1, tokens in 47331 / out 13825 (reasoning included in out), duration 712.4 s, cost 0.0284 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 7, tokens in 5580, cost 0.0002 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 1297, cost 0.0001 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` calls 1, tokens in 3954 / out 1561, cost 0.0030 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 7, tokens in 12065, cost 0.0005 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 10, tokens in 6935, cost 0.0003 USD, phases: path_judge 0.7 s, classifier 0.5 s, change_summary 8.6 s, doc_check 0.5 s, context 0.5 s, model_review 700.8 s, finding_judge 0.4 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main3 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
73bb6f6).Reviewed head `67db1767bfe66950e2a51e537f49bdacd7ef447a` against base `73bb6f6c209c8be3b21db42e76abeccdbbb3453d`, werkrevisor 0.26.0.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
67db1767bfe66950e2a51e537f49bdacd7ef447a.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
@@ -0,0 +15,4 @@## Non-Goals- No provider for the excerpt selection: its model is another one.Unclear Non-Goal, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.75, severity 1.2 of 3
The Non-Goal "No provider for the excerpt selection: its model is another one" is ambiguous. The excerpt selection uses the same
OpenRouterSelectorclass that supportsprovider_ordervia_routing, butExcerptConfigdoes not have aprovider_orderfield. The actual reason for not addingprovider_orderto excerpt is thatExcerptConfiglacks the field (and the PR only measured provider issues for MiniMax M3), not because "its model is another one". A reader might wonder why a different model would precludeprovider_order.Fixed: the Non-Goal now names the reason: the excerpt selection uses GPT-6 Luna, whose calls did not hang in the measurement.
New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
Classifier
7 of 7 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM failed (TimeoutError), tokens counted before the call 49221, duration 735.9 s, cost unknown, classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 7, tokens in 5593, cost 0.0002 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` calls 1, tokens in 3954 / out 1931, cost 0.0035 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 7, tokens in 13317, cost 0.0006 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 10, tokens in 6935, cost 0.0003 USD, phases: path_judge 0.8 s, classifier 0.5 s, change_summary 10.5 s, doc_check 0.5 s, context 0.4 s, model_review 722.7 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main3 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
73bb6f6).Reviewed head `6243a8dc6625822cdf68d347b666a1dfc8dffb61` against base `73bb6f6c209c8be3b21db42e76abeccdbbb3453d`, werkrevisor 0.26.0.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
6243a8dc6625822cdf68d347b666a1dfc8dffb61.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.