Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@@ -305,8 +305,12 @@ def _excerpt_selector(config, deps, use_llm, result):
 
 def _judge_paths(config, deps, use_llm, result, rules, diffs):
     if not rules.judged_files:

@@ -369,10 +374,26 @@ def _coverage(files, run, deps, config, excluded):
     return coverage_reasons(files, run, deps.is_reviewable, config.model.max_output_tokens, excluded)
 
 
+# Reasons that only say the model doubts or could not see enough; Jev's judgment of every file covers them.

@@ -252,6 +255,9 @@ def evaluate_rules(files, diffs, config):
                 judged_files.append(f)
             elif judged:
                 risky.append(f"{judged[0][0]} ({judged[0][1]})")
+            elif judge_all and cats_by_file[f.path] != "docs" and f.path not in mechanical:

@@ -0,0 +73,4 @@
+
+- [test_pathjudge: test_a_change_that_weakens_the_checks_gets_orange](../../tests/test_pathjudge.py)
+
+### Feature: the model only advises

@@ -369,10 +379,26 @@ def _coverage(files, run, deps, config, excluded):
     return coverage_reasons(files, run, deps.is_reviewable, config.model.max_output_tokens, excluded)
 
 
+# Reasons that only say the model doubts or could not see enough; Jev's judgment of every file covers them.

@@ -877,0 +902,4 @@
+    return config, describe_sources(sha if repo_data is not None else "", ref)
+
+
+def default_branch_head(gitea):

@@ -64,3 +90,2 @@
 
-def collect(files, diffs):
-    """Returns (units, unjudgeable files); an empty state would look harmless to Jev."""
+def collect(files, diffs, kinds=None):

@@ -61,3 +61,1 @@
-        for path in ("packaging/werkator.service", "werkdock/build-rootfs", "build.gradle.kts", ".werkator.yml",
-                     "src/main/kotlin/de/hoennig/werkator/config/ConfigLoader.kt",
-                     "src/main/kotlin/de/hoennig/werkator/build/PullRequestTargets.kt"):
+        # The isolation of the builds stays hard, Jev judges the build and CI files and, through scope "all", the rest.

@@ -877,0 +902,4 @@
+    return config, describe_sources(sha if repo_data is not None else "", ref)
+
+
+def default_branch_head(gitea):

@@ -115,3 +147,1 @@
-def verdict(values, config):
-    weakens, risk = values
-    if weakens >= config.orange_weakens_min or risk >= config.orange_risk_min:
+def verdict(values, config, kind=JUDGED):

@@ -0,0 +6,4 @@
+
+## The Problem
+
+On git.javagil.de, the last review before the merge was GREEN for 6 of 38 merged PRs.

@@ -508,9 +520,13 @@ def _validate(config):
         raise ConfigError(f"[engine] mode must be one of {', '.join(ENGINE_MODES)}")
     if config.engine.mode != "llm" and config.classifier is None:
         raise ConfigError(f"[engine] mode = '{config.engine.mode}' needs a [classifier] section")
+    if config.engine.model_role not in MODEL_ROLES:

@@ -306,1 +309,4 @@
+            and (config.engine.mode == "classifier" or config.engine.model_role == "advises"))
+
+
 def _judge_paths(config, deps, use_llm, result, rules, diffs):

@@ -569,3 +590,3 @@
     "categories": {key: _REPLACE for key in ("docs", "tests", "main", "api_spec", "harmless",
                                                "auto_approvable")},
-    "hard_yellow": {"paths": _ADD, "judged_paths": _ADD, "secret_scan": _ONLY_ON, "secret_scan_exclude": _REPLACE},
+    # The repository names its few hard paths itself; a change of its config always needs a human, and it is read

@@ -115,3 +154,1 @@
-def verdict(values, config):
-    weakens, risk = values
-    if weakens >= config.orange_weakens_min or risk >= config.orange_risk_min:
+def verdict(values, config, kind=JUDGED):