hint 4 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks, touch security nor show a risk category of the repository config according to Jev
hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
hint 6 changed file(s) agree with the PR document according to Jev
hint 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (each larger than [review] max_full_file_chars = 80000): werkrevisor/cli.py
4 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 15214, calls 1, tokens in 14801 / out 9690 (reasoning included in out), duration 697.6 s, cost 0.0125 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3641, cost 0.0002 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23247 / out 284, cost 0.0030 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 6, tokens in 9742, cost 0.0004 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3210, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.5 s, doc_check 2.7 s, context 4.7 s, model_review 689.0 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 88772c4).
Reviewed head `786ca61d0087261150f11156b0cbe8a21f0493ca` against base `88772c494abe8d265952e10c082327a0785451c2`, werkrevisor 0.54.1.
Diagrams
Drawn by a model from the diff with PR Lens: a view of what the PR touches, not a statement of what it does.
<!-- werkrevisor:786ca61d0087261150f11156b0cbe8a21f0493ca -->
<!-- werkrevisor-verdict:YELLOW -->
<!-- werkrevisor-blocks:f5158b39b34ae2c9cc6fc1b398463d88,ce803f5d430bedd6f6d3bc72bdbd491d,712f564368c6a31e97a633f19eeb6797,cd75dcdcb62fdb8f24cf32ac8f5d66d8,b8021a732485cbc79e3f12752637948b,0b768df035625e693411aa3830e67e74,8883f841a38a28873ca4a61078e91419,89fae90416aae7459b83aa8c229cc505,4a3b33b0a60780adc47b8ba4366335c1 -->
<!-- werkrevisor:diagrams -->
<!-- werkrevisor-folded -->
<details><summary>🟡 werkrevisor YELLOW for <code>786ca61</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/127#issuecomment-6969">the result for <code>061899b</code></a></summary>
## 🟡 werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW
Change kind: `mixed`.
### Reasons
- **YELLOW** spec: docs/prs/2026-10-20-PR#127-diagrams-keep-fold.md Scenario#127.01 hard_to_read (0.59 > yellow_above = 0.5)
- **hint** 4 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks, touch security nor show a risk category of the repository config according to Jev
- **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
- **hint** 6 changed file(s) agree with the PR document according to Jev
- **hint** 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (each larger than [review] max_full_file_chars = 80000): werkrevisor/cli.py
### Classifier
| Unit | Question | Problem | Confidence | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| docs/prs/2026-10-20-PR#127-diagrams-keep-fold.md Scenario#127.01 | hard_to_read | 0.59 | 0.60 | YELLOW |
4 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
<sub>
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 15214, calls 1, tokens in 14801 / out 9690 (reasoning included in out), duration 697.6 s, cost 0.0125 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3641, cost 0.0002 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23247 / out 284, cost 0.0030 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 6, tokens in 9742, cost 0.0004 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3210, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.5 s, doc_check 2.7 s, context 4.7 s, model_review 689.0 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 88772c4).<br>
Reviewed head `786ca61d0087261150f11156b0cbe8a21f0493ca` against base `88772c494abe8d265952e10c082327a0785451c2`, werkrevisor 0.54.1.
</sub>
### Diagrams
Drawn by a model from the diff with [PR Lens](https://github.com/coldteadotai/pr-lens): a view of what the PR touches, not a statement of what it does.


</details>
The change preserves result-comment folds when attaching diagrams; it does not change review verdicts, merge gates, permissions, or sensitive-data handling. Tests are extended without weakening existing checks.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status ai-review/codex: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 242626 (cached 217600) / out 1292, 56.5 s, 7 commands; reviewed head `786ca61d0087261150f11156b0cbe8a21f0493ca`.
<!-- werkrevisor-codex:786ca61d0087261150f11156b0cbe8a21f0493ca -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex-critical:false -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex-unattached:0 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex -->
<!-- werkrevisor-folded -->
<details><summary>⚠️ werkrevisor ERROR for <code>?</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/127#issuecomment-6969">the result for <code>061899b</code></a></summary>
## Codex review: not critical
The change preserves result-comment folds when attaching diagrams; it does not change review verdicts, merge gates, permissions, or sensitive-data handling. Tests are extended without weakening existing checks.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status `ai-review/codex`: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.
<sub>
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 242626 (cached 217600) / out 1292, 56.5 s, 7 commands; reviewed head `786ca61d0087261150f11156b0cbe8a21f0493ca`.
</sub>
</details>
New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
claude-code
changed title from werkrevisor 0.55.1: diagrams keep a fold of the result comment to werkrevisor 0.55.1: attaching the diagrams no longer removes the note that a newer review replaced the comment2026-10-21 07:22:01 +02:00
hint 4 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks, touch security nor show a risk category of the repository config according to Jev
hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
hint 6 changed file(s) agree with the PR document according to Jev
hint 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (each larger than [review] max_full_file_chars = 80000): werkrevisor/cli.py
Classifier
5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 14865, calls 1, tokens in 14464 / out 4583 (reasoning included in out), duration 63.2 s, cost 0.0098 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3701, cost 0.0002 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23247 / out 218, cost 0.0030 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 6, tokens in 9821, cost 0.0004 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3210, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.4 s, doc_check 0.3 s, context 4.7 s, model_review 57.1 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 02c5cad).
Reviewed head `061899b78f11650796e48570d97334dfdc99280c` against base `02c5cad01497e3bc457babf06bdcace76a87a777`, werkrevisor 0.55.0.
<!-- werkrevisor:061899b78f11650796e48570d97334dfdc99280c -->
<!-- werkrevisor-verdict:GREEN -->
<!-- werkrevisor-blocks:8abb1a6f8cc0e9d3f2d6c354d8d35d17,d92ddcc7370a643f365479be02f49703,45b25b783324b8d0644fe83627917269,cd75dcdcb62fdb8f24cf32ac8f5d66d8,b8021a732485cbc79e3f12752637948b,f18708fc0b04c8f01600b08fcc11fb25,8883f841a38a28873ca4a61078e91419,89fae90416aae7459b83aa8c229cc505,4a3b33b0a60780adc47b8ba4366335c1 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-folded -->
<details><summary>🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for <code>061899b</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/127#issuecomment-6979">the result for <code>747385a</code></a></summary>
## 🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Change kind: `mixed`.
### Reasons
- **hint** 4 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks, touch security nor show a risk category of the repository config according to Jev
- **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
- **hint** 6 changed file(s) agree with the PR document according to Jev
- **hint** 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (each larger than [review] max_full_file_chars = 80000): werkrevisor/cli.py
### Classifier
5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
<sub>
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 14865, calls 1, tokens in 14464 / out 4583 (reasoning included in out), duration 63.2 s, cost 0.0098 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3701, cost 0.0002 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23247 / out 218, cost 0.0030 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 6, tokens in 9821, cost 0.0004 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3210, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.4 s, doc_check 0.3 s, context 4.7 s, model_review 57.1 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 02c5cad).<br>
Reviewed head `061899b78f11650796e48570d97334dfdc99280c` against base `02c5cad01497e3bc457babf06bdcace76a87a777`, werkrevisor 0.55.0.
</sub>
</details>
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for 061899b78f11650796e48570d97334dfdc99280c.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `061899b78f11650796e48570d97334dfdc99280c`.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
<!-- werkrevisor-review:061899b78f11650796e48570d97334dfdc99280c -->
The change only preserves and formats review-comment content when attaching diagrams. It does not alter review verdicts, merge gates, permissions, credentials, or irreversible data operations.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status ai-review/codex: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 185182 (cached 141952) / out 1203, 42.7 s, 8 commands; reviewed head `061899b78f11650796e48570d97334dfdc99280c`.
<!-- werkrevisor-codex:061899b78f11650796e48570d97334dfdc99280c -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex-critical:false -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex-unattached:0 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex -->
<!-- werkrevisor-folded -->
<details><summary>⚠️ werkrevisor ERROR for <code>?</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/127#issuecomment-6979">the result for <code>747385a</code></a></summary>
## Codex review: not critical
The change only preserves and formats review-comment content when attaching diagrams. It does not alter review verdicts, merge gates, permissions, credentials, or irreversible data operations.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status `ai-review/codex`: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.
<sub>
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 185182 (cached 141952) / out 1203, 42.7 s, 8 commands; reviewed head `061899b78f11650796e48570d97334dfdc99280c`.
</sub>
</details>
claude-code
changed title from werkrevisor 0.55.1: attaching the diagrams no longer removes the note that a newer review replaced the comment to werkrevisor 0.57.1: attaching the diagrams no longer removes the note that a newer review replaced the comment2026-10-21 08:59:30 +02:00
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind: mixed.
Reasons
hint approval of werkrevisor for 061899b not carried over: 2 approved block(s) are missing
hint 4 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks, touch security nor show a risk category of the repository config according to Jev
hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
hint the PR document may contradict the file according to Jev: werkrevisor/__init__.py:1
hint 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (each larger than [review] max_full_file_chars = 80000): werkrevisor/cli.py
Findings
[medium] Claimed implementation is missing in the file at werkrevisor/__init__.py:1, hint, as a line comment
Classifier
5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 15935, calls 1, tokens in 15477 / out 5310 (reasoning included in out), duration 91.3 s, cost 0.0110 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3701, cost 0.0002 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23708 / out 286, cost 0.0031 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 6, tokens in 9812, cost 0.0004 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3202, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.4 s, doc_check 0.4 s, context 9.9 s, model_review 78.6 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 0349323).
Reviewed head `747385a6a473fb1fee5fbac257399372977fccb0` against base `0349323c850e9ae89e15daf05725a635933bb37a`, werkrevisor 0.57.0.
<!-- werkrevisor:747385a6a473fb1fee5fbac257399372977fccb0 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-verdict:GREEN -->
<!-- werkrevisor-blocks:8abb1a6f8cc0e9d3f2d6c354d8d35d17,d92ddcc7370a643f365479be02f49703,851d9bd8ca0655c177b128105cf9be18,cd75dcdcb62fdb8f24cf32ac8f5d66d8,b8021a732485cbc79e3f12752637948b,bcadaad60482d180d756fa32f58dbaa1,8883f841a38a28873ca4a61078e91419,89fae90416aae7459b83aa8c229cc505,4a3b33b0a60780adc47b8ba4366335c1 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-folded -->
<details><summary>🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for <code>747385a</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/127#issuecomment-7032">the result for <code>542c1c7</code></a></summary>
## 🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind: `mixed`.
### Reasons
- **hint** approval of werkrevisor for `061899b` not carried over: 2 approved block(s) are missing
- **hint** 4 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks, touch security nor show a risk category of the repository config according to Jev
- **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
- **hint** the PR document may contradict the file according to Jev: werkrevisor/__init__.py:1
- **hint** 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (each larger than [review] max_full_file_chars = 80000): werkrevisor/cli.py
### Findings
1. **[medium] Claimed implementation is missing in the file** at `werkrevisor/__init__.py:1`, hint, as a line comment
### Classifier
5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
<sub>
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 15935, calls 1, tokens in 15477 / out 5310 (reasoning included in out), duration 91.3 s, cost 0.0110 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3701, cost 0.0002 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23708 / out 286, cost 0.0031 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 6, tokens in 9812, cost 0.0004 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3202, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.4 s, doc_check 0.4 s, context 9.9 s, model_review 78.6 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 0349323).<br>
Reviewed head `747385a6a473fb1fee5fbac257399372977fccb0` against base `0349323c850e9ae89e15daf05725a635933bb37a`, werkrevisor 0.57.0.
</sub>
</details>
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for 747385a6a473fb1fee5fbac257399372977fccb0.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `747385a6a473fb1fee5fbac257399372977fccb0`.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
<!-- werkrevisor-review:747385a6a473fb1fee5fbac257399372977fccb0 -->
[medium] Claimed implementation is missing in the file (werkrevisor)
hint
Jev compared the diff of this file with the PR document: Claimed implementation is missing in the file 0.70.
Fix the PR document or the code, or reply why the file belongs to the PR, and resolve this comment.
File fingerprint fa702c87e4f7.
**[medium] Claimed implementation is missing in the file** (werkrevisor)
hint
Jev compared the diff of this file with the PR document: Claimed implementation is missing in the file 0.70.
Fix the PR document or the code, or reply why the file belongs to the PR, and resolve this comment.
File fingerprint `fa702c87e4f7`.
Holds not: this file changes only the version, 0.57.1, as the PR document states under its title (Version: patch). The implementation is in werkrevisor/cli.py and werkrevisor/prlens.py.
Holds not: this file changes only the version, 0.57.1, as the PR document states under its title (`Version: patch`). The implementation is in `werkrevisor/cli.py` and `werkrevisor/prlens.py`.
claude-code marked this conversation as resolved
ai-reviewer
canceled auto merging this pull request when all checks succeed 2026-10-21 09:01:41 +02:00
The change preserves comment folding when attaching diagrams; it does not alter review verdicts, merge gates, authentication, or authorization. Its effects are limited to reversible comment updates, with the intended behavior covered by a regression test.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status ai-review/codex: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 271664 (cached 241536) / out 1528, 60.8 s, 9 commands; reviewed head `747385a6a473fb1fee5fbac257399372977fccb0`.
<!-- werkrevisor-codex:747385a6a473fb1fee5fbac257399372977fccb0 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex-critical:false -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex-unattached:0 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex -->
<!-- werkrevisor-folded -->
<details><summary>⚠️ werkrevisor ERROR for <code>?</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/127#issuecomment-7032">the result for <code>542c1c7</code></a></summary>
## Codex review: not critical
The change preserves comment folding when attaching diagrams; it does not alter review verdicts, merge gates, authentication, or authorization. Its effects are limited to reversible comment updates, with the intended behavior covered by a regression test.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status `ai-review/codex`: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.
<sub>
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 271664 (cached 241536) / out 1528, 60.8 s, 9 commands; reviewed head `747385a6a473fb1fee5fbac257399372977fccb0`.
</sub>
</details>
claude-code
changed title from werkrevisor 0.57.1: attaching the diagrams no longer removes the note that a newer review replaced the comment to werkrevisor 0.59.1: attaching the diagrams no longer removes the note that a newer review replaced the comment2026-10-21 21:37:39 +02:00
_attach_diagrams reads the body again after the drawing and puts the diagrams inside a fold;
before, a fold by a newer result during the drawing was overwritten.
Found by the Codex review of PR#121 (line comment 6411).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
hint approval of werkrevisor for 747385a not carried over: 2 approved block(s) are missing
hint 4 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks, touch security nor show a risk category of the repository config according to Jev
hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
hint 6 changed file(s) agree with the PR document according to Jev
hint 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (each larger than [review] max_full_file_chars = 80000): werkrevisor/cli.py
Classifier
5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 16069, calls 1, tokens in 15606 / out 12512 (reasoning included in out), duration 146.0 s, cost 0.0197 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3701, cost 0.0002 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23708 / out 276, cost 0.0031 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 6, tokens in 9803, cost 0.0004 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3202, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.4 s, doc_check 0.4 s, context 5.1 s, model_review 138.9 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main b571067).
Reviewed head `542c1c794e66aa5291402064a0d485fe3c6ee604` against base `b57106773fde846378c072b83be6fa58aa836ea8`, werkrevisor 0.59.0.
<!-- werkrevisor:542c1c794e66aa5291402064a0d485fe3c6ee604 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-verdict:GREEN -->
<!-- werkrevisor-blocks:8abb1a6f8cc0e9d3f2d6c354d8d35d17,d92ddcc7370a643f365479be02f49703,0fae7c5e30e916b9c080f7f362efb1c4,cd75dcdcb62fdb8f24cf32ac8f5d66d8,b8021a732485cbc79e3f12752637948b,a37e65f873b68ec62e99d7755dac221d,8883f841a38a28873ca4a61078e91419,89fae90416aae7459b83aa8c229cc505,4a3b33b0a60780adc47b8ba4366335c1 -->
## 🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Change kind: `mixed`.
### Reasons
- **hint** approval of werkrevisor for `747385a` not carried over: 2 approved block(s) are missing
- **hint** 4 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks, touch security nor show a risk category of the repository config according to Jev
- **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
- **hint** 6 changed file(s) agree with the PR document according to Jev
- **hint** 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (each larger than [review] max_full_file_chars = 80000): werkrevisor/cli.py
### Classifier
5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
<sub>
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 16069, calls 1, tokens in 15606 / out 12512 (reasoning included in out), duration 146.0 s, cost 0.0197 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3701, cost 0.0002 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23708 / out 276, cost 0.0031 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 6, tokens in 9803, cost 0.0004 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3202, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.4 s, doc_check 0.4 s, context 5.1 s, model_review 138.9 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main b571067).<br>
Reviewed head `542c1c794e66aa5291402064a0d485fe3c6ee604` against base `b57106773fde846378c072b83be6fa58aa836ea8`, werkrevisor 0.59.0.
</sub>
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for 542c1c794e66aa5291402064a0d485fe3c6ee604.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `542c1c794e66aa5291402064a0d485fe3c6ee604`.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
<!-- werkrevisor-review:542c1c794e66aa5291402064a0d485fe3c6ee604 -->
ai-reviewer
scheduled this pull request to auto merge when all checks succeed 2026-10-21 21:41:10 +02:00
The change only preserves the current review-comment body when attaching diagrams and places them inside an existing fold. It does not alter security controls, review decisions, or merge gates.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status ai-review/codex: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 262607 (cached 233088) / out 1462, 51.1 s, 7 commands; reviewed head `542c1c794e66aa5291402064a0d485fe3c6ee604`.
<!-- werkrevisor-codex:542c1c794e66aa5291402064a0d485fe3c6ee604 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex-critical:false -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex-unattached:0 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex -->
## Codex review: not critical
The change only preserves the current review-comment body when attaching diagrams and places them inside an existing fold. It does not alter security controls, review decisions, or merge gates.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status `ai-review/codex`: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.
<sub>
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 262607 (cached 233088) / out 1462, 51.1 s, 7 commands; reviewed head `542c1c794e66aa5291402064a0d485fe3c6ee604`.
</sub>
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
See docs/prs for the PR document.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
🟡 werkrevisor YELLOW for
786ca61, superseded by the result for061899b🟡 werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
Classifier
4 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 15214, calls 1, tokens in 14801 / out 9690 (reasoning included in out), duration 697.6 s, cost 0.0125 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3641, cost 0.0002 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23247 / out 284, cost 0.0030 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 6, tokens in 9742, cost 0.0004 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3210, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.5 s, doc_check 2.7 s, context 4.7 s, model_review 689.0 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main88772c4).Reviewed head `786ca61d0087261150f11156b0cbe8a21f0493ca` against base `88772c494abe8d265952e10c082327a0785451c2`, werkrevisor 0.54.1.
Diagrams
Drawn by a model from the diff with PR Lens: a view of what the PR touches, not a statement of what it does.
⚠️ werkrevisor ERROR for
?, superseded by the result for061899bCodex review: not critical
The change preserves result-comment folds when attaching diagrams; it does not change review verdicts, merge gates, permissions, or sensitive-data handling. Tests are extended without weakening existing checks.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 242626 (cached 217600) / out 1292, 56.5 s, 7 commands; reviewed head `786ca61d0087261150f11156b0cbe8a21f0493ca`.ai-review/codex: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.786ca61d00to217a8b40c5New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
werkrevisor 0.55.1: diagrams keep a fold of the result commentto werkrevisor 0.55.1: attaching the diagrams no longer removes the note that a newer review replaced the comment🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for
061899b, superseded by the result for747385a🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
Classifier
5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 14865, calls 1, tokens in 14464 / out 4583 (reasoning included in out), duration 63.2 s, cost 0.0098 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3701, cost 0.0002 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23247 / out 218, cost 0.0030 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 6, tokens in 9821, cost 0.0004 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3210, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.4 s, doc_check 0.3 s, context 4.7 s, model_review 57.1 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main02c5cad).Reviewed head `061899b78f11650796e48570d97334dfdc99280c` against base `02c5cad01497e3bc457babf06bdcace76a87a777`, werkrevisor 0.55.0.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
061899b78f11650796e48570d97334dfdc99280c.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
⚠️ werkrevisor ERROR for
?, superseded by the result for747385aCodex review: not critical
The change only preserves and formats review-comment content when attaching diagrams. It does not alter review verdicts, merge gates, permissions, credentials, or irreversible data operations.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 185182 (cached 141952) / out 1203, 42.7 s, 8 commands; reviewed head `061899b78f11650796e48570d97334dfdc99280c`.ai-review/codex: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.werkrevisor 0.55.1: attaching the diagrams no longer removes the note that a newer review replaced the commentto werkrevisor 0.57.1: attaching the diagrams no longer removes the note that a newer review replaced the comment061899b78fto747385a6a4New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for
747385a, superseded by the result for542c1c7🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
061899bnot carried over: 2 approved block(s) are missingFindings
werkrevisor/__init__.py:1, hint, as a line commentClassifier
5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 15935, calls 1, tokens in 15477 / out 5310 (reasoning included in out), duration 91.3 s, cost 0.0110 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3701, cost 0.0002 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23708 / out 286, cost 0.0031 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 6, tokens in 9812, cost 0.0004 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3202, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.4 s, doc_check 0.4 s, context 9.9 s, model_review 78.6 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main0349323).Reviewed head `747385a6a473fb1fee5fbac257399372977fccb0` against base `0349323c850e9ae89e15daf05725a635933bb37a`, werkrevisor 0.57.0.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
747385a6a473fb1fee5fbac257399372977fccb0.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
@@ -1 +1 @@__version__ = "0.57.0"__version__ = "0.57.1"[medium] Claimed implementation is missing in the file (werkrevisor)
hint
Jev compared the diff of this file with the PR document: Claimed implementation is missing in the file 0.70.
Fix the PR document or the code, or reply why the file belongs to the PR, and resolve this comment.
File fingerprint
fa702c87e4f7.Holds not: this file changes only the version, 0.57.1, as the PR document states under its title (
Version: patch). The implementation is inwerkrevisor/cli.pyandwerkrevisor/prlens.py.⚠️ werkrevisor ERROR for
?, superseded by the result for542c1c7Codex review: not critical
The change preserves comment folding when attaching diagrams; it does not alter review verdicts, merge gates, authentication, or authorization. Its effects are limited to reversible comment updates, with the intended behavior covered by a regression test.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 271664 (cached 241536) / out 1528, 60.8 s, 9 commands; reviewed head `747385a6a473fb1fee5fbac257399372977fccb0`.ai-review/codex: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.werkrevisor 0.57.1: attaching the diagrams no longer removes the note that a newer review replaced the commentto werkrevisor 0.59.1: attaching the diagrams no longer removes the note that a newer review replaced the comment747385a6a4to542c1c794eNew commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
747385anot carried over: 2 approved block(s) are missingClassifier
5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 16069, calls 1, tokens in 15606 / out 12512 (reasoning included in out), duration 146.0 s, cost 0.0197 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3701, cost 0.0002 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23708 / out 276, cost 0.0031 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 6, tokens in 9803, cost 0.0004 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3202, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.4 s, doc_check 0.4 s, context 5.1 s, model_review 138.9 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at mainb571067).Reviewed head `542c1c794e66aa5291402064a0d485fe3c6ee604` against base `b57106773fde846378c072b83be6fa58aa836ea8`, werkrevisor 0.59.0.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
542c1c794e66aa5291402064a0d485fe3c6ee604.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
Codex review: not critical
The change only preserves the current review-comment body when attaching diagrams and places them inside an existing fold. It does not alter security controls, review decisions, or merge gates.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 262607 (cached 233088) / out 1462, 51.1 s, 7 commands; reviewed head `542c1c794e66aa5291402064a0d485fe3c6ee604`.ai-review/codex: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.