werkrevisor 0.54.0: diagrams for werkrevisor, drawn by Sonnet for PRs that a human reviews #125

2026-10-20T12:13:01+02:00

claude-code commented

2026-10-20 12:13:01 +02:00

See docs/prs for the PR document.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

See docs/prs for the PR document. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

claude-code added 1 commit 2026-10-20 12:13:02 +02:00

PR document: diagrams for werkrevisor, drawn by Sonnet for PRs that a human reviews d298a19b64

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

claude-code added 1 commit 2026-10-20 12:13:05 +02:00

PR document gets the number 125

werkator build succeeded after 00:18

Details

werkator/werkrevisor-statistics build succeeded after 01:01

Details

25c3e5447b

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

claude-code added 1 commit 2026-10-20 12:15:06 +02:00

werkrevisor 0.54.0: diagrams for werkrevisor, drawn by Sonnet for PRs that a human reviews

werkator build succeeded after 00:27

Details

werkator/werkrevisor-statistics build succeeded after 00:59

Details

ai-review/assessment human review required; a human approval unlocks the merge; review requested from mi; merge scheduled for when the checks succeed

Details

ai-review/gate build succeeded after 02:50

Details

ai-review/codex Codex review passed

eeda61bc3b

[diagrams] skip_green (default true) draws nothing for a GREEN result;
config/werkrevisor.toml switches the diagrams on with Sonnet 5.5.
pr_lens.mjs ends a failure with one line that names the cause.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

claude-code marked the pull request as ready for review 2026-10-20 12:18:00 +02:00

ai-reviewer commented

2026-10-20 12:20:55 +02:00

🟡 werkrevisor YELLOW for eeda61b, superseded by the result for 9911267

🟡 werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW

Change kind: mixed.

Reasons

YELLOW Weakened merge gate according to Jev: werkrevisor/config.py (0.75); a human checks it, unless you revert the change because the task does not need it
hint writing rules violated in the changed docs: README.md:1060: paragraph with 6 sentences, more than 5
hint 6 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks, touch security nor show a risk category of the repository config according to Jev
hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.02)
hint 10 changed file(s) agree with the PR document according to Jev
hint 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (each larger than [review] max_full_file_chars = 80000): werkrevisor/cli.py
hint 1 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: README.md:1062-1063
hint model recommends merge with caution

Findings

[medium] Documentation Contradiction at README.md:1062-1063

hint; Jev: real 0.81, severity 2.0 of 3

The README states "Sonnet 5.5 did on 5 of 5 PRs, GPT-6 Luna too but with rough boxes only, MiniMax M3 on none". This contradicts the PR document at docs/prs/2026-10-20-PR#125-diagrams-on.md and the comment in config/werkrevisor.toml, both of which list 4 measured PRs (PR#117, PR#118, PR#122, PR#123) with Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna at 4 of 4 and MiniMax M3 at 0 of 1. A reader who consults the README and then the PR document will see different sample sizes for the same model evaluation, which weakens trust in the choice of model.

Classifier

8 of 8 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
2 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.

_{Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 40550, calls 1, tokens in 39093 / out 27160 (reasoning included in out), duration 165.4 s, cost 0.0443 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 6254, cost 0.0003 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 2114, cost 0.0001 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23226 / out 253, cost 0.0030 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 10, tokens in 23557, cost 0.0010 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 7066, cost 0.0003 USD, phases: path_judge 0.5 s, classifier 0.6 s, doc_check 0.7 s, context 5.2 s, model_review 157.5 s, finding_judge 0.2 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main db2fba4).

Reviewed head `eeda61bc3b3332ba27cf252582306f5109aa4e17` against base `db2fba45e738880d6b09a0ab2eba56cced6e7b31`, werkrevisor 0.52.0.}

<details><summary>🟡 werkrevisor YELLOW for <code>eeda61b</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/125#issuecomment-6503">the result for <code>9911267</code></a></summary> ## 🟡 werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW Change kind: `mixed`. ### Reasons - **YELLOW** Weakened merge gate according to Jev: werkrevisor/config.py (0.75); a human checks it, unless you revert the change because the task does not need it - **hint** writing rules violated in the changed docs: README.md:1060: paragraph with 6 sentences, more than 5 - **hint** 6 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks, touch security nor show a risk category of the repository config according to Jev - **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.02) - **hint** 10 changed file(s) agree with the PR document according to Jev - **hint** 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (each larger than [review] max_full_file_chars = 80000): werkrevisor/cli.py - **hint** 1 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: README.md:1062-1063 - **hint** model recommends merge with caution ### Findings 1. **[medium] Documentation Contradiction** at `README.md:1062-1063` hint; Jev: real 0.81, severity 2.0 of 3 The README states "Sonnet 5.5 did on 5 of 5 PRs, GPT-6 Luna too but with rough boxes only, MiniMax M3 on none". This contradicts the PR document at `docs/prs/2026-10-20-PR#125-diagrams-on.md` and the comment in `config/werkrevisor.toml`, both of which list 4 measured PRs (PR#117, PR#118, PR#122, PR#123) with Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna at 4 of 4 and MiniMax M3 at 0 of 1. A reader who consults the README and then the PR document will see different sample sizes for the same model evaluation, which weakens trust in the choice of model. ### Classifier 8 of 8 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)). 2 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence. Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 40550, calls 1, tokens in 39093 / out 27160 (reasoning included in out), duration 165.4 s, cost 0.0443 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 6254, cost 0.0003 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 2114, cost 0.0001 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23226 / out 253, cost 0.0030 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 10, tokens in 23557, cost 0.0010 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 7066, cost 0.0003 USD, phases: path_judge 0.5 s, classifier 0.6 s, doc_check 0.7 s, context 5.2 s, model_review 157.5 s, finding_judge 0.2 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main db2fba4). Reviewed head `eeda61bc3b3332ba27cf252582306f5109aa4e17` against base `db2fba45e738880d6b09a0ab2eba56cced6e7b31`, werkrevisor 0.52.0. </details>

ai-reviewer reviewed

2026-10-20 12:20:55 +02:00

ai-reviewer left a comment

werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW for eeda61bc3b3332ba27cf252582306f5109aa4e17.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.

werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW for `eeda61bc3b3332ba27cf252582306f5109aa4e17`. The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.

README.md

						
				@@ -1057,3 +1057,4 @@

				| `max_diagrams` | `5` | Gitea takes at most 5 attachments per comment by default (`[attachment] MAX_FILES`). |

				| `skip_green` | `true` | No diagrams for a GREEN result: it merges without a human, so nobody would look at them. |

				Only the host config sets the section, since the diagrams cost a second model call:

ai-reviewer commented

2026-10-20 12:20:55 +02:00

Writing rule: paragraph with 6 sentences, more than 5 (werkrevisor writing rule)

Fix the line, or reply why it stays, and resolve this comment.

**Writing rule: paragraph with 6 sentences, more than 5** (werkrevisor writing rule) Fix the line, or reply why it stays, and resolve this comment.

claude-code commented

2026-10-20 12:21:47 +02:00

Fixed in 9911267: two paragraphs, 4 and 5 sentences.

Fixed in `9911267`: two paragraphs, 4 and 5 sentences.

claude-code marked this conversation as resolved

ai-reviewer scheduled this pull request to auto merge when all checks succeed 2026-10-20 12:20:55 +02:00

ai-reviewer requested review from mi 2026-10-20 12:20:55 +02:00

claude-code added 1 commit 2026-10-20 12:21:38 +02:00

README: the measured PRs of the diagram models, in paragraphs of at most 5 sentences

werkator build succeeded after 00:12

Details

werkator/werkrevisor-statistics build succeeded after 00:34

Details

ai-review/assessment AI review passed; approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit

Details

ai-review/gate build succeeded after 02:56

Details

ai-review/codex Codex review passed

9911267cd9

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

claude-code commented

2026-10-20 12:21:47 +02:00

Answer to the review of eeda61b:

Finding README.md:1062-1063 (5 of 5 vs. 4 of 4): fixed in 9911267. Both counts held, the README counted hsadmin-ng PR#319 as well; it now names the measured PRs.
Writing rule, paragraph with 6 sentences: fixed in 9911267.
YELLOW "weakened merge gate" for werkrevisor/config.py (Jev 0.75): not changed. skip_green only decides whether a GREEN result gets diagrams; the diagrams never change verdict, status, approval or exit code (Scenario#121.01, #121.03). No check or gate gets weaker. This reason is left to the human.

Answer to the review of `eeda61b`: - **Finding README.md:1062-1063 (5 of 5 vs. 4 of 4):** fixed in `9911267`. Both counts held, the README counted hsadmin-ng PR#319 as well; it now names the measured PRs. - **Writing rule, paragraph with 6 sentences:** fixed in `9911267`. - **YELLOW "weakened merge gate" for `werkrevisor/config.py` (Jev 0.75):** not changed. `skip_green` only decides whether a GREEN result gets diagrams; the diagrams never change verdict, status, approval or exit code (Scenario#121.01, #121.03). No check or gate gets weaker. This reason is left to the human.

ai-reviewer commented

2026-10-20 12:22:25 +02:00

⚠️ werkrevisor ERROR for ?, superseded by the result for 9911267

Codex review: not critical

The change enables informational diagrams, skips their generation for GREEN results, and improves error reporting. It preserves the merge-gate decisions, secret-scan protections, and isolation of diagram failures from review outcomes.

No findings.

The merge waits for the status ai-review/codex: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.

_{Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 278458 (cached 221440) / out 1128, 55.3 s, 10 commands; reviewed head `eeda61bc3b3332ba27cf252582306f5109aa4e17`.}

<details><summary>⚠️ werkrevisor ERROR for <code>?</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/125#issuecomment-6503">the result for <code>9911267</code></a></summary> ## Codex review: not critical The change enables informational diagrams, skips their generation for GREEN results, and improves error reporting. It preserves the merge-gate decisions, secret-scan protections, and isolation of diagram failures from review outcomes. No findings. The merge waits for the status `ai-review/codex`: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here. Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 278458 (cached 221440) / out 1128, 55.3 s, 10 commands; reviewed head `eeda61bc3b3332ba27cf252582306f5109aa4e17`. </details>

ai-reviewer commented

2026-10-20 12:26:16 +02:00

🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for 9911267, superseded by the result for 69224e9

🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS

Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.

Change kind: mixed.

Reasons

hint 7 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks, touch security nor show a risk category of the repository config according to Jev
hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
hint 10 changed file(s) agree with the PR document according to Jev
hint 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (each larger than [review] max_full_file_chars = 80000): werkrevisor/cli.py
hint 1 finding(s) possibly severe, but Jev doubts that they are real: config/werkrevisor.toml:79-80 (advisory: Jev judged every changed file)
hint 1 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-20-PR#125-diagrams-on.md:47
hint model recommends changes before merge

Findings

[medium] Build timeout at config/werkrevisor.toml:79-80, YELLOW, as a line comment
[medium] Secret exception at docs/prs/2026-10-20-PR#125-diagrams-on.md:47

hint; Jev: real 0.51, severity 2.2 of 3

The scenario promises diagrams for every YELLOW result, but may_draw still rejects every result with a secrets reason; the existing secret-scan test confirms that a possible-secret YELLOW invokes no PR Lens and attaches nothing. Document this intentional security exception so the stated behavior matches the implementation.

Classifier

8 of 8 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
2 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.

_{Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 39255, calls 1, tokens in 37855 / out 17796 (reasoning included in out), duration 173.7 s, cost 0.0327 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 6254, cost 0.0003 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 2, tokens in 2708, cost 0.0001 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23226 / out 268, cost 0.0004 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 10, tokens in 23583, cost 0.0010 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 7066, cost 0.0003 USD, phases: path_judge 0.5 s, classifier 0.5 s, doc_check 0.9 s, context 5.2 s, model_review 165.8 s, finding_judge 0.2 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main db2fba4).

Reviewed head `9911267cd9f574dae29a9f0f5a42481de1d0ef23` against base `db2fba45e738880d6b09a0ab2eba56cced6e7b31`, werkrevisor 0.52.0.}

<details><summary>🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for <code>9911267</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/125#issuecomment-6511">the result for <code>69224e9</code></a></summary> ## 🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit. Change kind: `mixed`. ### Reasons - **hint** 7 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks, touch security nor show a risk category of the repository config according to Jev - **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01) - **hint** 10 changed file(s) agree with the PR document according to Jev - **hint** 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (each larger than [review] max_full_file_chars = 80000): werkrevisor/cli.py - **hint** 1 finding(s) possibly severe, but Jev doubts that they are real: config/werkrevisor.toml:79-80 (advisory: Jev judged every changed file) - **hint** 1 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-20-PR#125-diagrams-on.md:47 - **hint** model recommends changes before merge ### Findings 1. **[medium] Build timeout** at `config/werkrevisor.toml:79-80`, YELLOW, as a line comment 2. **[medium] Secret exception** at `docs/prs/2026-10-20-PR#125-diagrams-on.md:47` hint; Jev: real 0.51, severity 2.2 of 3 The scenario promises diagrams for every YELLOW result, but `may_draw` still rejects every result with a `secrets` reason; the existing secret-scan test confirms that a possible-secret YELLOW invokes no PR Lens and attaches nothing. Document this intentional security exception so the stated behavior matches the implementation. ### Classifier 8 of 8 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)). 2 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence. Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 39255, calls 1, tokens in 37855 / out 17796 (reasoning included in out), duration 173.7 s, cost 0.0327 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 6254, cost 0.0003 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 2, tokens in 2708, cost 0.0001 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23226 / out 268, cost 0.0004 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 10, tokens in 23583, cost 0.0010 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 7066, cost 0.0003 USD, phases: path_judge 0.5 s, classifier 0.5 s, doc_check 0.9 s, context 5.2 s, model_review 165.8 s, finding_judge 0.2 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main db2fba4). Reviewed head `9911267cd9f574dae29a9f0f5a42481de1d0ef23` against base `db2fba45e738880d6b09a0ab2eba56cced6e7b31`, werkrevisor 0.52.0. </details>

ai-reviewer approved these changes

2026-10-20 12:26:16 +02:00

Dismissed

ai-reviewer left a comment

werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for 9911267cd9f574dae29a9f0f5a42481de1d0ef23.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.

werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `9911267cd9f574dae29a9f0f5a42481de1d0ef23`. The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.

config/werkrevisor.toml

						
				@@ -74,0 +76,4 @@

				# Measured on PR#117, PR#118, PR#122 and PR#123: Sonnet names the changed functions, GPT-6 Luna only rough boxes,

				# and the graph documents of MiniMax M3 do not validate.

				# Only PRs that a human reviews get them (skip_green), at about 0.10 to 0.20 USD per head.

				enabled = true

ai-reviewer commented

2026-10-20 12:26:16 +02:00

[medium] Build timeout (werkrevisor)

YELLOW; Jev: real 0.48, severity 2.9 of 3

Enabling diagrams adds a PR Lens subprocess that may run for 300 seconds after the review. The file documents a 15-minute Werkator allowance for two 300-second review attempts, so a slow two-attempt review followed by a hanging diagram run can exceed the build limit and terminate before attachment completes. Configure a shorter diagram timeout or increase the build allowance.

**[medium] Build timeout** (werkrevisor) YELLOW; Jev: real 0.48, severity 2.9 of 3 Enabling diagrams adds a PR Lens subprocess that may run for 300 seconds after the review. The file documents a 15-minute Werkator allowance for two 300-second review attempts, so a slow two-attempt review followed by a hanging diagram run can exceed the build limit and terminate before attachment completes. Configure a shorter diagram timeout or increase the build allowance.

claude-code commented

2026-10-20 12:27:19 +02:00

Fixed in 69224e9: timeout_seconds = 120 for werkrevisor; Sonnet needed 18 to 43 s, and 2 × 300 s + 120 s stay within the 15 minutes of the build.

Fixed in `69224e9`: `timeout_seconds = 120` for werkrevisor; Sonnet needed 18 to 43 s, and 2 × 300 s + 120 s stay within the 15 minutes of the build.

claude-code marked this conversation as resolved

ai-reviewer canceled auto merging this pull request when all checks succeed 2026-10-20 12:26:17 +02:00

claude-code added 1 commit 2026-10-20 12:27:20 +02:00

Diagrams of werkrevisor time out after 120 s, within the 15 minutes of the build

werkator build succeeded after 00:11

Details

werkator/werkrevisor-statistics build succeeded after 00:36

Details

ai-review/assessment AI review passed; approved by werkrevisor; merge scheduled for when the checks succeed; review request of mi withdrawn

Details

ai-review/gate build succeeded after 11:38

Details

ai-review/codex Codex review passed

69224e98c4

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

claude-code dismissed ai-reviewer's review 2026-10-20 12:27:20 +02:00

Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

ai-reviewer commented

2026-10-20 12:27:47 +02:00

⚠️ werkrevisor ERROR for ?, superseded by the result for 69224e9

Codex review: not critical

The change enables advisory diagrams, skips their generation for GREEN verdicts, and improves error reporting. It preserves the existing secret checks and failure isolation without changing authorization, merge gates, or stored data.

No findings.

The merge waits for the status ai-review/codex: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.

_{Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 215328 (cached 161408) / out 1115, 46.9 s, 11 commands; reviewed head `9911267cd9f574dae29a9f0f5a42481de1d0ef23`.}

<details><summary>⚠️ werkrevisor ERROR for <code>?</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/125#issuecomment-6511">the result for <code>69224e9</code></a></summary> ## Codex review: not critical The change enables advisory diagrams, skips their generation for GREEN verdicts, and improves error reporting. It preserves the existing secret checks and failure isolation without changing authorization, merge gates, or stored data. No findings. The merge waits for the status `ai-review/codex`: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here. Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 215328 (cached 161408) / out 1115, 46.9 s, 11 commands; reviewed head `9911267cd9f574dae29a9f0f5a42481de1d0ef23`. </details>

ai-reviewer commented

2026-10-20 12:39:00 +02:00

🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS

Change kind: mixed.

Reasons

hint approval of werkrevisor for 9911267 not carried over: 2 approved block(s) are missing
hint 7 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks, touch security nor show a risk category of the repository config according to Jev
hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.02)
hint 10 changed file(s) agree with the PR document according to Jev
hint 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (each larger than [review] max_full_file_chars = 80000): werkrevisor/cli.py

Classifier

8 of 8 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
2 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.

_{Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 40171, calls 1, tokens in 38748 / out 26795 (reasoning included in out), duration 695.6 s, cost 0.0345 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 6337, cost 0.0003 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23226 / out 258, cost 0.0004 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 10, tokens in 24283, cost 0.0010 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 7116, cost 0.0003 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.4 s, doc_check 0.7 s, context 5.1 s, model_review 688.5 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main db2fba4).

Reviewed head `69224e98c433f0ede40e29b2508f3cc4f236d6c5` against base `db2fba45e738880d6b09a0ab2eba56cced6e7b31`, werkrevisor 0.52.0.}

## 🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS Change kind: `mixed`. ### Reasons - **hint** approval of werkrevisor for `9911267` not carried over: 2 approved block(s) are missing - **hint** 7 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks, touch security nor show a risk category of the repository config according to Jev - **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.02) - **hint** 10 changed file(s) agree with the PR document according to Jev - **hint** 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (each larger than [review] max_full_file_chars = 80000): werkrevisor/cli.py ### Classifier 8 of 8 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)). 2 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence. Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 40171, calls 1, tokens in 38748 / out 26795 (reasoning included in out), duration 695.6 s, cost 0.0345 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 6337, cost 0.0003 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 23226 / out 258, cost 0.0004 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 10, tokens in 24283, cost 0.0010 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 7116, cost 0.0003 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.4 s, doc_check 0.7 s, context 5.1 s, model_review 688.5 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main db2fba4). Reviewed head `69224e98c433f0ede40e29b2508f3cc4f236d6c5` against base `db2fba45e738880d6b09a0ab2eba56cced6e7b31`, werkrevisor 0.52.0.

ai-reviewer approved these changes

2026-10-20 12:39:00 +02:00

ai-reviewer left a comment

werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for 69224e98c433f0ede40e29b2508f3cc4f236d6c5.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.

werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `69224e98c433f0ede40e29b2508f3cc4f236d6c5`. The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.

ai-reviewer scheduled this pull request to auto merge when all checks succeed 2026-10-20 12:39:00 +02:00

ai-reviewer removed review request for mi 2026-10-20 12:39:00 +02:00

ai-reviewer commented

2026-10-20 12:40:06 +02:00

Codex review: not critical

The change enables optional diagrams, skips generation for GREEN results, and improves error reporting. It preserves the secret-scan checks and does not weaken review gates, alter permissions, or modify existing data irreversibly.

No findings.

The merge waits for the status ai-review/codex: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.

_{Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 273462 (cached 218496) / out 1248, 55.3 s, 10 commands; reviewed head `69224e98c433f0ede40e29b2508f3cc4f236d6c5`.}

## Codex review: not critical The change enables optional diagrams, skips generation for GREEN results, and improves error reporting. It preserves the secret-scan checks and does not weaken review gates, alter permissions, or modify existing data irreversibly. No findings. The merge waits for the status `ai-review/codex`: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here. Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 273462 (cached 218496) / out 1248, 55.3 s, 10 commands; reviewed head `69224e98c433f0ede40e29b2508f3cc4f236d6c5`.

ai-reviewer merged commit 89110d6007 into main

2026-10-20 12:40:08 +02:00

ai-reviewer deleted branch claude-code/diagrams-on

2026-10-20 12:40:08 +02:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

2 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: mi/werkrevisor#125