The plan gets #orch.wipConflict: the server finds the conflict of a WIP pull request with git merge-tree, since Gitea API gives mergeable false for each WIP.
See doc/prs/2026-10-15-PR#89-wip-conflict-plan.md.
The plan gets #orch.wipConflict: the server finds the conflict of a WIP pull request with git merge-tree, since Gitea API gives mergeable false for each WIP.
See doc/prs/2026-10-15-PR#89-wip-conflict-plan.md.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
ai-review/assessment AI review passed; approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 2 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 2 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind: docs_only.
Reasons
hint writing rules violated in the changed docs: doc/prs/2026-10-15-PR#89-wip-conflict-plan.md:22: more than one sentence on a line
hint 1 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: doc/prs/2026-10-15-PR#89-wip-conflict-plan.md:11
Findings
[low] Unclear wording at doc/prs/2026-10-15-PR#89-wip-conflict-plan.md:11, hint, as a line comment
Classifier
5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
1 answer ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 5173, calls 1, tokens in 5084 / out 9141 (reasoning included in out), duration 69.2 s, cost 0.0125 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3389, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `none` calls 0, tokens in 0, cost 0.0000 USD, phases: classifier 0.5 s, context 0.1 s, model_review 68.2 s, finding_judge 0.0 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main ca48887).
Reviewed head `b3d630cf74d3730b7b094edf2a66b4d69b62f797` against base `ca48887f1b293be7cbe200c49ebc81bc6cafa47f`, werkrevisor 0.43.0.
<!-- werkrevisor:b3d630cf74d3730b7b094edf2a66b4d69b62f797 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-verdict:GREEN -->
<!-- werkrevisor-blocks:834c2c14d00271aad6f0376b3c7c0abc,b1b080c539c82ddb4ecbea3d8360f7df,d9f77d718122ce3061633ffac6c12fcf -->
<!-- werkrevisor-folded -->
<details><summary>🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for <code>b3d630c</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkregie/pulls/89#issuecomment-6024">the result for <code>d89cf4c</code></a></summary>
## 🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 2 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind: `docs_only`.
### Reasons
- **hint** writing rules violated in the changed docs: doc/prs/2026-10-15-PR#89-wip-conflict-plan.md:22: more than one sentence on a line
- **hint** 1 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: doc/prs/2026-10-15-PR#89-wip-conflict-plan.md:11
### Findings
1. **[low] Unclear wording** at `doc/prs/2026-10-15-PR#89-wip-conflict-plan.md:11`, hint, as a line comment
### Classifier
5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
1 answer ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
<sub>
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 5173, calls 1, tokens in 5084 / out 9141 (reasoning included in out), duration 69.2 s, cost 0.0125 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3389, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `none` calls 0, tokens in 0, cost 0.0000 USD, phases: classifier 0.5 s, context 0.1 s, model_review 68.2 s, finding_judge 0.0 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main ca48887).<br>
Reviewed head `b3d630cf74d3730b7b094edf2a66b4d69b62f797` against base `ca48887f1b293be7cbe200c49ebc81bc6cafa47f`, werkrevisor 0.43.0.
</sub>
</details>
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for b3d630cf74d3730b7b094edf2a66b4d69b62f797.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `b3d630cf74d3730b7b094edf2a66b4d69b62f797`.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
<!-- werkrevisor-review:b3d630cf74d3730b7b094edf2a66b4d69b62f797 -->
The phrase "shows a conflict that the agent leaves, but none of a draft" is ambiguous; the intended meaning is that PR#43 surfaces conflicts the agent left, but not those of drafts. A reader has to re-parse the sentence to grasp it. Reword, e.g., "shows a conflict the agent leaves, but none of a draft" or "shows conflicts the agent leaves, but not those of drafts".
**[low] Unclear wording** (werkrevisor)
hint
The phrase "shows a conflict that the agent leaves, but none of a draft" is ambiguous; the intended meaning is that PR#43 surfaces conflicts the agent left, but not those of drafts. A reader has to re-parse the sentence to grasp it. Reword, e.g., "shows a conflict the agent leaves, but none of a draft" or "shows conflicts the agent leaves, but not those of drafts".
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for d89cf4c17c8c9080cd80e3d9ef5a4bfaeafa5026.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `d89cf4c17c8c9080cd80e3d9ef5a4bfaeafa5026`.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
<!-- werkrevisor-review:d89cf4c17c8c9080cd80e3d9ef5a4bfaeafa5026 -->
ai-reviewer
scheduled this pull request to auto merge when all checks succeed 2026-10-15 08:37:43 +02:00
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
The plan gets #orch.wipConflict: the server finds the conflict of a WIP pull request with git merge-tree, since Gitea API gives mergeable false for each WIP.
See doc/prs/2026-10-15-PR#89-wip-conflict-plan.md.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for
b3d630c, superseded by the result ford89cf4c🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 2 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind:
docs_only.Reasons
Findings
doc/prs/2026-10-15-PR#89-wip-conflict-plan.md:11, hint, as a line commentClassifier
5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 5173, calls 1, tokens in 5084 / out 9141 (reasoning included in out), duration 69.2 s, cost 0.0125 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3389, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `none` calls 0, tokens in 0, cost 0.0000 USD, phases: classifier 0.5 s, context 0.1 s, model_review 68.2 s, finding_judge 0.0 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main1 answer ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
ca48887).Reviewed head `b3d630cf74d3730b7b094edf2a66b4d69b62f797` against base `ca48887f1b293be7cbe200c49ebc81bc6cafa47f`, werkrevisor 0.43.0.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
b3d630cf74d3730b7b094edf2a66b4d69b62f797.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
@@ -0,0 +8,4 @@## Related Links- [werkregie PR#43](https://git.javagil.de/mi/werkregie/pulls/43), which shows a conflict that the agent leaves, but none of a draft.[low] Unclear wording (werkrevisor)
hint
The phrase "shows a conflict that the agent leaves, but none of a draft" is ambiguous; the intended meaning is that PR#43 surfaces conflicts the agent left, but not those of drafts. A reader has to re-parse the sentence to grasp it. Reword, e.g., "shows a conflict the agent leaves, but none of a draft" or "shows conflicts the agent leaves, but not those of drafts".
@@ -0,0 +19,4 @@## Non-Goals- No code; the plan only. The code follows once no other pull request of werkregie is open.Writing rule: more than one sentence on a line (werkrevisor writing rule)
Fix the line, or reply why it stays, and resolve this comment.
@@ -0,0 +8,4 @@## Related Links- [werkregie PR#43](https://git.javagil.de/mi/werkregie/pulls/43), which shows conflicts that the agent leaves, but not those of drafts.Fixed in
d89cf4c.@@ -0,0 +19,4 @@## Non-Goals- No code; the plan only.Fixed in
d89cf4c.New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Change kind:
docs_only.Reasons
b3d630cnot carried over: 1 approved block(s) are missingClassifier
5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 5175, calls 1, tokens in 5086 / out 10844 (reasoning included in out), duration 90.9 s, cost 0.0145 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3389, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: classifier 0.4 s, context 0.3 s, model_review 89.7 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main1 answer ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
ca48887).Reviewed head `d89cf4c17c8c9080cd80e3d9ef5a4bfaeafa5026` against base `ca48887f1b293be7cbe200c49ebc81bc6cafa47f`, werkrevisor 0.43.0.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
d89cf4c17c8c9080cd80e3d9ef5a4bfaeafa5026.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.