Names follow javagil.de #86
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: mi/werkregie#86
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
The shared workflow gets a rule for names: on the JVM, packages, Maven groups and Gradle plugin IDs start with
de.javagil.<repo>.A PR that moves many files starts only when no other PR of the repository is open.
The moves of the repositories follow in PRs of their own.
See doc/prs/2026-10-14-PR#86-javagil-names.md.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
WIP: Names follow javagil.de; werkregie moves to de.javagil.werkregieto WIP: Names follow javagil.de🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for
5a53d29, superseded by the result for71c8fcc🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 2 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind:
docs_only.Reasons
Findings
Non-standard Terminology at
doc/prs/2026-10-14-PR#86-javagil-names.md:30, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line commentUnclear Werkcrappit Status at
doc/prs/2026-10-14-PR#86-javagil-names.md:11-12, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line commentClassifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 5171, calls 1, tokens in 5107 / out 19650 (reasoning included in out), duration 102.4 s, cost 0.0251 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2766, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 2, tokens in 2214, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: classifier 0.3 s, context 0.1 s, model_review 101.4 s, finding_judge 0.2 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at mainc8a1de7).Reviewed head `5a53d29f8d62ab018cd6fd269ce8a6372608db52` against base `c8a1de77df860833eafa0b352a65db9464117461`, werkrevisor 0.41.2.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
5a53d29f8d62ab018cd6fd269ce8a6372608db52.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
@@ -0,0 +8,4 @@## ProblemThe Werk repositories name their code in three ways: `de.hoennig` in werkator, werkjournal, werkregie and werkrevisor,Unclear Werkcrappit Status, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.65, severity 1.1 of 3
The Problem section lists three naming schemes, including
de.javagil.werkcrappit. This already follows the new rule (de.javagil.<repo>), so werkcrappit does not need to move. The PR document groups werkcrappit with the non-compliant repositories without distinguishing its status, while the plan correctly omits a werkcrappit move sub-item. A reader might infer that werkcrappit also needs a move. The PR document should note that werkcrappit already follows the new rule.@@ -0,0 +27,4 @@on the JVM, packages, Maven groups and Gradle plugin IDs start with `de.javagil.<repo>`.- `doc/agentic-workflow.md`, "Scope of a PR": a PR that moves or renames many files starts only when no other PRof the repository is open, and the move is all it does.- The plan gets the moves per repository; the CHANGELOG node of werkcrappit is `[^]` since werkcrappit PR#70.Non-standard Terminology, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.79, severity 1.1 of 3
The PR document refers to a plan entry as "the CHANGELOG node of werkcrappit", but in werkbaum terminology "node" refers to top-level entries with
#prefix. The referenced item is a sub-item under#ops.version, not a node. A reader searching for a "CHANGELOG node" in the plan would not find one. The PR document should use clearer wording, e.g., "the CHANGELOG entry of werkcrappit".@@ -0,0 +8,4 @@## ProblemThe Werk repositories name their code in three ways: `de.hoennig` in werkator, werkjournal, werkregie and werkrevisor,Fixed in
71c8fcc: werkcrappit already follows the rule; the others move.@@ -0,0 +27,4 @@- `doc/agentic-workflow.md`, "Code and Comments": names follow javagil.de in the way of their ecosystem;on the JVM, packages, Maven groups and Gradle plugin IDs start with `de.javagil.<repo>`.- `doc/agentic-workflow.md`, "Scope of a PR": a PR that moves or renames many files starts only when no other PRof the repository is open, and the move is all it does.No change: the shared workflow calls each item of a Werkbaum file a node, e.g. "A PR sets its nodes to
[x]" in "The Plan in Werkbaum"; the#idonly addresses a node.New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Change kind:
docs_only.Reasons
5a53d29not carried over: 1 approved block(s) are missingFindings
Underspecified scope at
doc/prs/2026-10-14-PR#86-javagil-names.md:27-31, severity unknown, counted as mediumhint; Jev: real 0.79, severity 1.9 of 3
The PR document's Solution section describes only the JVM rule (
de.javagil.<repo>), butdoc/agentic-workflow.mdalso adds rules for Go modules (git.javagil.de/<owner>/<repo>) and npm packages (@javagil). The Solution mentions "in the way of their ecosystem" without listing these additional ecosystems, and the Werkbaum node #ops.names title only references the JVM rule. The PR document should describe all three ecosystems so the change is fully specified, or the additional rules should be removed from the workflow.Unclear wording at
doc/prs/2026-10-14-PR#86-javagil-names.md:13, severity unknown, counted as mediumhint; Jev: real 0.76, severity 1.0 of 3
The sentence "Their packages and plugins are published under git.javagil.de" is imprecise: Maven and Gradle artifacts are published on registries (Maven Central, Gradle Plugin Portal), not on a Git server, and "published under" is ambiguous. The phrasing should make clear whether it means "hosted on", "owned by", or something else.
Classifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 5190, calls 1, tokens in 5125 / out 31584 (reasoning included in out), duration 134.5 s, cost 0.0394 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2782, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 2, tokens in 2254, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: classifier 0.3 s, context 0.1 s, model_review 133.5 s, finding_judge 0.2 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at mainc8a1de7).Reviewed head `71c8fcc1f1c528d47c51baff135c3d92da12476d` against base `c8a1de77df860833eafa0b352a65db9464117461`, werkrevisor 0.41.2.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
71c8fcc1f1c528d47c51baff135c3d92da12476d.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.