The PR changes retentionPerBranch from 3 to 5 but contains no PR documentation (no doc/PR/*.md or docs/prs/*.md). The description only says "Test case 2 of the AI review trial" and does not explain why retention is raised, the expected increase in artifact storage (roughly 67% more per branch), or whether the Gitea/CI storage can absorb it. In a CI configuration, a reviewer cannot judge the impact without this rationale.
Usage: model `openrouter/anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5`, LLM done, calls 1, tokens in 3030 / out 315 (reasoning included in out), duration 0.0 s, cost 0.0092 USD (reported).
Reviewed head `0c104768fe005a757f962c716abbe0107096e125` against base `520dffc37b99224be8550f05714af7e7ac99563e`, werkrevisor 0.2.0.
<!-- werkrevisor:0c104768fe005a757f962c716abbe0107096e125 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-verdict:YELLOW -->
## 🟡 werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW
Change kind: `mixed`.
### Reasons
- **YELLOW** change kind 'mixed' is not AI-approvable
- **YELLOW** risky paths changed: .werkator.yml (.werkator*)
- **YELLOW** model recommends merge with caution
- **YELLOW** model reports 1 key issue(s)
### Findings
1. **Missing PR Documentation** at `.werkator.yml:16`
The PR changes `retentionPerBranch` from 3 to 5 but contains no PR documentation (no `doc/PR/*.md` or `docs/prs/*.md`). The description only says "Test case 2 of the AI review trial" and does not explain why retention is raised, the expected increase in artifact storage (roughly 67% more per branch), or whether the Gitea/CI storage can absorb it. In a CI configuration, a reviewer cannot judge the impact without this rationale.
<sub>
Usage: model `openrouter/anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5`, LLM done, calls 1, tokens in 3030 / out 315 (reasoning included in out), duration 0.0 s, cost 0.0092 USD (reported).<br>
Reviewed head `0c104768fe005a757f962c716abbe0107096e125` against base `520dffc37b99224be8550f05714af7e7ac99563e`, werkrevisor 0.2.0.
</sub>
ai-reviewer
requested review from mi 2026-10-05 05:50:23 +02:00
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Test case 2 of the AI review trial: a change in a deliberately risky area (CI configuration).
🟡 werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
Findings
-
Usage: model `openrouter/anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5`, LLM done, calls 1, tokens in 3030 / out 315 (reasoning included in out), duration 0.0 s, cost 0.0092 USD (reported).Missing PR Documentation at
.werkator.yml:16The PR changes
retentionPerBranchfrom 3 to 5 but contains no PR documentation (nodoc/PR/*.mdordocs/prs/*.md). The description only says "Test case 2 of the AI review trial" and does not explain why retention is raised, the expected increase in artifact storage (roughly 67% more per branch), or whether the Gitea/CI storage can absorb it. In a CI configuration, a reviewer cannot judge the impact without this rationale.Reviewed head `0c104768fe005a757f962c716abbe0107096e125` against base `520dffc37b99224be8550f05714af7e7ac99563e`, werkrevisor 0.2.0.
Retention 5 ist ok, der Speicher reicht.