The README links the latest code city, structure page and matrix of the demo in werkprobe, and werkcrappit's own latest code city.
See `docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md`.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
claude-code
marked the pull request as ready for review 2026-10-12 06:43:47 +02:00
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for 4a3109bcab26b5243dc289b74e4ee2efc796f06c.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `4a3109bcab26b5243dc289b74e4ee2efc796f06c`.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
<!-- werkrevisor-review:4a3109bcab26b5243dc289b74e4ee2efc796f06c -->
ai-reviewer
scheduled this pull request to auto merge when all checks succeed 2026-10-12 06:44:30 +02:00
werkrevisor, review restarted for 4a3109bcab26b5243dc289b74e4ee2efc796f06c: approved by werkrevisor; merge conflict with main: the author rebases the branch onto main and pushes.
werkrevisor, review restarted for `4a3109bcab26b5243dc289b74e4ee2efc796f06c`: approved by werkrevisor; merge conflict with main: the author rebases the branch onto main and pushes.
claude-code
changed title from The README links the demo's latest charts (0.26.13) to The README links the demo's latest charts (0.26.14)2026-10-14 16:00:20 +02:00
ai-review/assessment AI review passed; approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind: mixed.
Reasons
hint approval of werkrevisor for 4a3109b not carried over: 3 approved block(s) are missing
hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
hint 2 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:27, docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:26
hint model recommends merge with caution
Findings
Confusing version statement at docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:27, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line comment
Vague plan-update claim at docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:26, severity unknown, counted as medium
hint; Jev: real 0.85, severity 1.0 of 3
The document says "The plan notes the link." without specifying which of the four added links (demo code city, demo structure, demo matrix, werkcrappit's own code city) the plan notes. The actual docs/werkcrappit.werkbaum update only mentions the werkcrappit own code city link ("the README links its latest code city since PR#68"), not the three demo links. The statement is therefore both vague and inconsistent with what the plan actually notes.
Classifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
1 answer ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 6402, calls 1, tokens in 6247 / out 3281 (reasoning included in out), duration 44.1 s, cost 0.0058 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2711, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 2, tokens in 2891, cost 0.0001 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 658, cost 0.0000 USD, phases: path_judge 0.2 s, classifier 0.2 s, context 1.7 s, model_review 41.4 s, finding_judge 0.3 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 691aa96).
Reviewed head `40c4b2a5a30695026eac66e0e0a178adcf4ce939` against base `691aa96091e828a57d7319c37e49a18dde8d99a0`, werkrevisor 0.41.2.
<!-- werkrevisor:40c4b2a5a30695026eac66e0e0a178adcf4ce939 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-verdict:GREEN -->
<!-- werkrevisor-blocks:7de9de2c62a9e615be4bc15a8d84d945,ef16c47fdffd82c98556e895a31c6f7e,dc9a12d6e88be1c8f045050d9950f2f5,8a11a7bf83dca3fe02aa322188ba5c1f,1da8576cfdebbd4bb3b9213bcd7c76f0 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-folded -->
<details><summary>🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for <code>40c4b2a</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkcrappit/pulls/68#issuecomment-5617">the result for <code>23871bd</code></a></summary>
## 🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind: `mixed`.
### Reasons
- **hint** approval of werkrevisor for `4a3109b` not carried over: 3 approved block(s) are missing
- **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
- **hint** 2 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:27, docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:26
- **hint** model recommends merge with caution
### Findings
1. **Confusing version statement** at `docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:27`, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line comment
2. **Vague plan-update claim** at `docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:26`, severity unknown, counted as medium
hint; Jev: real 0.85, severity 1.0 of 3
The document says "The plan notes the link." without specifying which of the four added links (demo code city, demo structure, demo matrix, werkcrappit's own code city) the plan notes. The actual `docs/werkcrappit.werkbaum` update only mentions the werkcrappit own code city link ("the README links its latest code city since PR#68"), not the three demo links. The statement is therefore both vague and inconsistent with what the plan actually notes.
### Classifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
1 answer ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
<sub>
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 6402, calls 1, tokens in 6247 / out 3281 (reasoning included in out), duration 44.1 s, cost 0.0058 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2711, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 2, tokens in 2891, cost 0.0001 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 658, cost 0.0000 USD, phases: path_judge 0.2 s, classifier 0.2 s, context 1.7 s, model_review 41.4 s, finding_judge 0.3 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 691aa96).<br>
Reviewed head `40c4b2a5a30695026eac66e0e0a178adcf4ce939` against base `691aa96091e828a57d7319c37e49a18dde8d99a0`, werkrevisor 0.41.2.
</sub>
</details>
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for 40c4b2a5a30695026eac66e0e0a178adcf4ce939.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `40c4b2a5a30695026eac66e0e0a178adcf4ce939`.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
<!-- werkrevisor-review:40c4b2a5a30695026eac66e0e0a178adcf4ce939 -->
Confusing version statement, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.81, severity 1.1 of 3
The PR document states "Version 0.26.14; 0.26.13 went to PR#69." This is confusing and appears to contradict the visible CHANGELOG.md, which already lists 0.26.13 as a previously released version. Since this PR is PR#68, a previously released 0.26.13 cannot have "went to PR#69" (a higher-numbered, future PR). The intent is likely that the next version (0.26.15) will be set in PR#69, or that 0.26.13 was set in a prior PR, but as written the sentence is contradictory and obscures the actual versioning chain. A reader cannot tell which version is current and which is next.
**Confusing version statement**, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.81, severity 1.1 of 3
The PR document states "Version 0.26.14; 0.26.13 went to PR#69." This is confusing and appears to contradict the visible `CHANGELOG.md`, which already lists 0.26.13 as a previously released version. Since this PR is PR#68, a previously released 0.26.13 cannot have "went to PR#69" (a higher-numbered, future PR). The intent is likely that the next version (0.26.15) will be set in PR#69, or that 0.26.13 was set in a prior PR, but as written the sentence is contradictory and obscures the actual versioning chain. A reader cannot tell which version is current and which is next.
"Confusing version statement": PR#69 was merged first and took 0.26.13, so this PR is 0.26.14.
"Vague plan-update claim": the plan notes, at its node of the nightly build, that the README links werkcrappit's own code city.
Round after the rebase, fixed in 23871bd:
- "Confusing version statement": PR#69 was merged first and took 0.26.13, so this PR is 0.26.14.
- "Vague plan-update claim": the plan notes, at its node of the nightly build, that the README links werkcrappit's own code city.
ai-review/assessment AI review passed; approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind: mixed.
Reasons
hint approval of werkrevisor for 40c4b2a not carried over: 1 approved block(s) are missing
hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.03, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
hint 2 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:24, docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:27
Findings
Stray '>' in URL template at docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:24, severity unknown, counted as medium
hint; Jev: real 0.50, severity 0.9 of 3
The path inside the inline code ends with a stray > character, so the template renders as /repos/<repo>/branches/main_mutation/> instead of the intended /repos/<repo>/branches/main_mutation/. The README URLs do not include this character; the typo is local to the PR document.
Unclear version note at docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:27, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line comment
Classifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 6284, calls 1, tokens in 6137 / out 16384 (reasoning included in out), duration 120.5 s, cost 0.0215 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2733, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 2, tokens in 2817, cost 0.0001 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 658, cost 0.0000 USD, phases: path_judge 0.3 s, classifier 0.3 s, context 0.2 s, model_review 119.0 s, finding_judge 0.2 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 691aa96).
Reviewed head `23871bd41e0b3a0aaf44cec4b3800538cef1105b` against base `691aa96091e828a57d7319c37e49a18dde8d99a0`, werkrevisor 0.41.2.
<!-- werkrevisor:23871bd41e0b3a0aaf44cec4b3800538cef1105b -->
<!-- werkrevisor-verdict:GREEN -->
<!-- werkrevisor-blocks:7de9de2c62a9e615be4bc15a8d84d945,ef16c47fdffd82c98556e895a31c6f7e,dc9a12d6e88be1c8f045050d9950f2f5,b58c483f1af4f438bb46457d3f113edb,1da8576cfdebbd4bb3b9213bcd7c76f0 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-folded -->
<details><summary>🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for <code>23871bd</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkcrappit/pulls/68#issuecomment-5635">the result for <code>dc34993</code></a></summary>
## 🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind: `mixed`.
### Reasons
- **hint** approval of werkrevisor for `40c4b2a` not carried over: 1 approved block(s) are missing
- **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.03, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
- **hint** 2 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:24, docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:27
### Findings
1. **Stray '>' in URL template** at `docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:24`, severity unknown, counted as medium
hint; Jev: real 0.50, severity 0.9 of 3
The path inside the inline code ends with a stray `>` character, so the template renders as `/repos/<repo>/branches/main_mutation/>` instead of the intended `/repos/<repo>/branches/main_mutation/`. The README URLs do not include this character; the typo is local to the PR document.
2. **Unclear version note** at `docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:27`, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line comment
### Classifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
<sub>
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 6284, calls 1, tokens in 6137 / out 16384 (reasoning included in out), duration 120.5 s, cost 0.0215 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2733, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 2, tokens in 2817, cost 0.0001 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 658, cost 0.0000 USD, phases: path_judge 0.3 s, classifier 0.3 s, context 0.2 s, model_review 119.0 s, finding_judge 0.2 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 691aa96).<br>
Reviewed head `23871bd41e0b3a0aaf44cec4b3800538cef1105b` against base `691aa96091e828a57d7319c37e49a18dde8d99a0`, werkrevisor 0.41.2.
</sub>
</details>
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for 23871bd41e0b3a0aaf44cec4b3800538cef1105b.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `23871bd41e0b3a0aaf44cec4b3800538cef1105b`.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
<!-- werkrevisor-review:23871bd41e0b3a0aaf44cec4b3800538cef1105b -->
Unclear version note, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.63, severity 1.0 of 3
The sentence "Version 0.26.14: PR#69 was merged before this PR and took 0.26.13." claims a higher-numbered PR (#69) was merged before a lower-numbered one (#68, this PR). Without further context a reader may suspect an error in either the PR number or the version. A clearer formulation would separate the version from the PR-ordering note.
**Unclear version note**, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.63, severity 1.0 of 3
The sentence "Version 0.26.14: PR#69 was merged before this PR and took 0.26.13." claims a higher-numbered PR (#69) was merged before a lower-numbered one (#68, this PR). Without further context a reader may suspect an error in either the PR number or the version. A clearer formulation would separate the version from the PR-ordering note.
"Unclear version note", fixed in dc34993: the version stands apart from the order of the PRs.
"Stray '>' in URL template", no change: <repo> in /repos/<repo>/branches/main_mutation/ is a placeholder; its > closes it, and the path ends with main_mutation/.
The CI build of the previous head failed after 20 s without an error in its logs, right after Gradle forked its daemon; that head changed only two lines of this document, and the build before passed. The push starts a new build.
Round 3:
- "Unclear version note", fixed in dc34993: the version stands apart from the order of the PRs.
- "Stray '>' in URL template", no change: `<repo>` in `/repos/<repo>/branches/main_mutation/` is a placeholder; its `>` closes it, and the path ends with `main_mutation/`.
- The CI build of the previous head failed after 20 s without an error in its logs, right after Gradle forked its daemon; that head changed only two lines of this document, and the build before passed. The push starts a new build.
ai-review/assessment AI review passed; approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind: mixed.
Reasons
hint approval of werkrevisor for 23871bd not carried over: 1 approved block(s) are missing
hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.03, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
hint 1 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:27-28
Findings
Unclear Version Note at docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:27-28, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line comment
Classifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 6290, calls 1, tokens in 6143 / out 11760 (reasoning included in out), duration 91.1 s, cost 0.0159 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2739, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 1513, cost 0.0001 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 658, cost 0.0000 USD, phases: path_judge 0.2 s, classifier 0.3 s, context 0.3 s, model_review 89.6 s, finding_judge 0.3 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 691aa96).
Reviewed head `dc34993f2153b263e2f5ede972339b4b956e513b` against base `691aa96091e828a57d7319c37e49a18dde8d99a0`, werkrevisor 0.41.2.
<!-- werkrevisor:dc34993f2153b263e2f5ede972339b4b956e513b -->
<!-- werkrevisor-verdict:GREEN -->
<!-- werkrevisor-blocks:7de9de2c62a9e615be4bc15a8d84d945,ef16c47fdffd82c98556e895a31c6f7e,dc9a12d6e88be1c8f045050d9950f2f5,2cf500129b2af8ff786e9cd4546538ab,1da8576cfdebbd4bb3b9213bcd7c76f0 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-folded -->
<details><summary>🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for <code>dc34993</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkcrappit/pulls/68#issuecomment-5648">the result for <code>92b142b</code></a></summary>
## 🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind: `mixed`.
### Reasons
- **hint** approval of werkrevisor for `23871bd` not carried over: 1 approved block(s) are missing
- **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.03, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
- **hint** 1 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:27-28
### Findings
1. **Unclear Version Note** at `docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:27-28`, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line comment
### Classifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
<sub>
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 6290, calls 1, tokens in 6143 / out 11760 (reasoning included in out), duration 91.1 s, cost 0.0159 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2739, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 1513, cost 0.0001 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 658, cost 0.0000 USD, phases: path_judge 0.2 s, classifier 0.3 s, context 0.3 s, model_review 89.6 s, finding_judge 0.3 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 691aa96).<br>
Reviewed head `dc34993f2153b263e2f5ede972339b4b956e513b` against base `691aa96091e828a57d7319c37e49a18dde8d99a0`, werkrevisor 0.41.2.
</sub>
</details>
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for dc34993f2153b263e2f5ede972339b4b956e513b.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `dc34993f2153b263e2f5ede972339b4b956e513b`.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
<!-- werkrevisor-review:dc34993f2153b263e2f5ede972339b4b956e513b -->
Unclear Version Note, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.50, severity 1.0 of 3
The PR document states "Version 0.26.14." as one bullet and "0.26.13 is taken: PR#69 was opened after this PR, but merged first." as a sub-bullet. The sub-bullet explains why this PR uses 0.26.14 instead of 0.26.13, but the relationship is implicit: the reader has to infer that this PR originally intended to use 0.26.13 but had to skip to 0.26.14 because PR#69 consumed 0.26.13. The wording would be clearer if the connection were explicit, e.g., "Version 0.26.14 (0.26.13 was taken by PR#69, which was opened after this PR but merged first)."
**Unclear Version Note**, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.50, severity 1.0 of 3
The PR document states "Version 0.26.14." as one bullet and "0.26.13 is taken: PR#69 was opened after this PR, but merged first." as a sub-bullet. The sub-bullet explains why this PR uses 0.26.14 instead of 0.26.13, but the relationship is implicit: the reader has to infer that this PR originally intended to use 0.26.13 but had to skip to 0.26.14 because PR#69 consumed 0.26.13. The wording would be clearer if the connection were explicit, e.g., "Version 0.26.14 (0.26.13 was taken by PR#69, which was opened after this PR but merged first)."
Round 4, fixed in 92b142b: "Unclear Version Note", the version stands without a note. The CI build of round 3's head passed, so its earlier failure was not caused by this PR.
Round 4, fixed in 92b142b: "Unclear Version Note", the version stands without a note. The CI build of round 3's head passed, so its earlier failure was not caused by this PR.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for 92b142b1b595e32edfe7da85fb4e03491296be65.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `92b142b1b595e32edfe7da85fb4e03491296be65`.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
<!-- werkrevisor-review:92b142b1b595e32edfe7da85fb4e03491296be65 -->
ai-reviewer
scheduled this pull request to auto merge when all checks succeed 2026-10-14 16:42:43 +02:00
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
The README links the latest code city, structure page and matrix of the demo in werkprobe, and werkcrappit's own latest code city.
See
docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for
4a3109b, superseded by the result for40c4b2a🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
Classifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 6393, calls 1, tokens in 6238 / out 2800 (reasoning included in out), duration 28.8 s, cost 0.0052 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2696, cost 0.0001 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 658, cost 0.0000 USD, phases: path_judge 0.2 s, classifier 0.2 s, context 0.1 s, model_review 27.9 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main1 answer ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
e98c594).Reviewed head `4a3109bcab26b5243dc289b74e4ee2efc796f06c` against base `e98c594480b1a124a42e1fabeb5fe3dc52e0ad1c`, werkrevisor 0.34.1.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
4a3109bcab26b5243dc289b74e4ee2efc796f06c.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
werkrevisor, review restarted for
4a3109bcab26b5243dc289b74e4ee2efc796f06c: approved by werkrevisor; merge conflict with main: the author rebases the branch onto main and pushes.The README links the demo's latest charts (0.26.13)to The README links the demo's latest charts (0.26.14)4a3109bcabto40c4b2a5a3New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for
40c4b2a, superseded by the result for23871bd🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
4a3109bnot carried over: 3 approved block(s) are missingFindings
Confusing version statement at
docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:27, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line commentVague plan-update claim at
docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:26, severity unknown, counted as mediumhint; Jev: real 0.85, severity 1.0 of 3
The document says "The plan notes the link." without specifying which of the four added links (demo code city, demo structure, demo matrix, werkcrappit's own code city) the plan notes. The actual
docs/werkcrappit.werkbaumupdate only mentions the werkcrappit own code city link ("the README links its latest code city since PR#68"), not the three demo links. The statement is therefore both vague and inconsistent with what the plan actually notes.Classifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 6402, calls 1, tokens in 6247 / out 3281 (reasoning included in out), duration 44.1 s, cost 0.0058 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2711, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 2, tokens in 2891, cost 0.0001 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 658, cost 0.0000 USD, phases: path_judge 0.2 s, classifier 0.2 s, context 1.7 s, model_review 41.4 s, finding_judge 0.3 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main1 answer ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
691aa96).Reviewed head `40c4b2a5a30695026eac66e0e0a178adcf4ce939` against base `691aa96091e828a57d7319c37e49a18dde8d99a0`, werkrevisor 0.41.2.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
40c4b2a5a30695026eac66e0e0a178adcf4ce939.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
@@ -0,0 +24,4 @@Werkator serves the latest artifacts of a build under `/repos/<repo>/branches/main_mutation/`;each link answered 200 on 2026-10-12, after the green nightly builds of werkcrappit at 03:00 and werkprobe at 04:00 UTC.- The plan notes the link.- Version 0.26.14; 0.26.13 went to PR#69.Confusing version statement, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.81, severity 1.1 of 3
The PR document states "Version 0.26.14; 0.26.13 went to PR#69." This is confusing and appears to contradict the visible
CHANGELOG.md, which already lists 0.26.13 as a previously released version. Since this PR is PR#68, a previously released 0.26.13 cannot have "went to PR#69" (a higher-numbered, future PR). The intent is likely that the next version (0.26.15) will be set in PR#69, or that 0.26.13 was set in a prior PR, but as written the sentence is contradictory and obscures the actual versioning chain. A reader cannot tell which version is current and which is next.Fixed in
23871bd: "Version 0.26.14: PR#69 was merged before this PR and took 0.26.13." PR numbers follow the opening, versions the merge.Round after the rebase, fixed in
23871bd:New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for
23871bd, superseded by the result fordc34993🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
40c4b2anot carried over: 1 approved block(s) are missingFindings
Stray '>' in URL template at
docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:24, severity unknown, counted as mediumhint; Jev: real 0.50, severity 0.9 of 3
The path inside the inline code ends with a stray
>character, so the template renders as/repos/<repo>/branches/main_mutation/>instead of the intended/repos/<repo>/branches/main_mutation/. The README URLs do not include this character; the typo is local to the PR document.Unclear version note at
docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:27, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line commentClassifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 6284, calls 1, tokens in 6137 / out 16384 (reasoning included in out), duration 120.5 s, cost 0.0215 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2733, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 2, tokens in 2817, cost 0.0001 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 658, cost 0.0000 USD, phases: path_judge 0.3 s, classifier 0.3 s, context 0.2 s, model_review 119.0 s, finding_judge 0.2 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main691aa96).Reviewed head `23871bd41e0b3a0aaf44cec4b3800538cef1105b` against base `691aa96091e828a57d7319c37e49a18dde8d99a0`, werkrevisor 0.41.2.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
23871bd41e0b3a0aaf44cec4b3800538cef1105b.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
@@ -0,0 +24,4 @@Werkator serves the latest artifacts of a build under `/repos/<repo>/branches/main_mutation/`;each link answered 200 on 2026-10-12, after the green nightly builds of werkcrappit at 03:00 and werkprobe at 04:00 UTC.- The plan notes at its node of the nightly build that the README links werkcrappit's own code city.- Version 0.26.14: PR#69 was merged before this PR and took 0.26.13.Unclear version note, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.63, severity 1.0 of 3
The sentence "Version 0.26.14: PR#69 was merged before this PR and took 0.26.13." claims a higher-numbered PR (#69) was merged before a lower-numbered one (#68, this PR). Without further context a reader may suspect an error in either the PR number or the version. A clearer formulation would separate the version from the PR-ordering note.
Fixed in
dc34993: "Version 0.26.14." on its own, then "0.26.13 is taken: PR#69 was opened after this PR, but merged first."Round 3:
dc34993: the version stands apart from the order of the PRs.<repo>in/repos/<repo>/branches/main_mutation/is a placeholder; its>closes it, and the path ends withmain_mutation/.New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for
dc34993, superseded by the result for92b142b🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
23871bdnot carried over: 1 approved block(s) are missingFindings
docs/prs/2026-10-12-PR#68-demo-links.md:27-28, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line commentClassifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 6290, calls 1, tokens in 6143 / out 11760 (reasoning included in out), duration 91.1 s, cost 0.0159 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2739, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 1513, cost 0.0001 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 658, cost 0.0000 USD, phases: path_judge 0.2 s, classifier 0.3 s, context 0.3 s, model_review 89.6 s, finding_judge 0.3 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main691aa96).Reviewed head `dc34993f2153b263e2f5ede972339b4b956e513b` against base `691aa96091e828a57d7319c37e49a18dde8d99a0`, werkrevisor 0.41.2.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
dc34993f2153b263e2f5ede972339b4b956e513b.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
@@ -0,0 +24,4 @@Werkator serves the latest artifacts of a build under `/repos/<repo>/branches/main_mutation/`;each link answered 200 on 2026-10-12, after the green nightly builds of werkcrappit at 03:00 and werkprobe at 04:00 UTC.- The plan notes at its node of the nightly build that the README links werkcrappit's own code city.- Version 0.26.14.Unclear Version Note, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.50, severity 1.0 of 3
The PR document states "Version 0.26.14." as one bullet and "0.26.13 is taken: PR#69 was opened after this PR, but merged first." as a sub-bullet. The sub-bullet explains why this PR uses 0.26.14 instead of 0.26.13, but the relationship is implicit: the reader has to infer that this PR originally intended to use 0.26.13 but had to skip to 0.26.14 because PR#69 consumed 0.26.13. The wording would be clearer if the connection were explicit, e.g., "Version 0.26.14 (0.26.13 was taken by PR#69, which was opened after this PR but merged first)."
Fixed in
92b142b: the note is gone; the document says only "Version 0.26.14.", asCHANGELOG.mdandbuild.gradle.ktsdo.New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
Round 4, fixed in
92b142b: "Unclear Version Note", the version stands without a note. The CI build of round 3's head passed, so its earlier failure was not caused by this PR.🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
dc34993not carried over: 1 approved block(s) are missingClassifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 6403, calls 1, tokens in 6248 / out 3804 (reasoning included in out), duration 43.3 s, cost 0.0064 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2713, cost 0.0001 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 658, cost 0.0000 USD, phases: path_judge 0.2 s, classifier 0.3 s, context 0.3 s, model_review 42.0 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main1 answer ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
691aa96).Reviewed head `92b142b1b595e32edfe7da85fb4e03491296be65` against base `691aa96091e828a57d7319c37e49a18dde8d99a0`, werkrevisor 0.41.2.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
92b142b1b595e32edfe7da85fb4e03491296be65.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.