Review round of 9289382c: the ORANGE finding is fixed in e0e74ff.
Fixed in e0e74ff: the check refuses a path with a .. segment and a bare build/.
Fixed in 9289382: the message names --llm and --prompt-out.
Review round of bcdf1b6e: Scenario#65.03 is split into two plain scenarios, and both hints are fixed in 9289382.
Fixed in 9289382: the --no-llm case is Scenario#65.04 with its own reason: with --no-llm, werkrevisor never builds a prompt.
Answer to the werkrevisor review of a7b20f8:
- Finding, WIP contradiction: the PR description no longer says it stays WIP; the RFC is accepted, as the PR document says.
- Finding, changelog…
Fixed in 2373ccb: "No." and "Yes." are joined to their sentence with a colon; the long line is wrapped.
Fixed in 2373ccb: the item is split into four sub-items of at most three sentences.
Fixed in 2373ccb: the 0.23.2 entry says the views are planned, not yet built, and describes what the accepted RFC plans.
Fixed: the PR description no longer says it stays WIP; the human user accepted the RFC on 2026-10-09, as the PR document says. WIP: is off the title.
Fixed in bcdf1b6: the help names both conditions, with --no-publish and without --no-llm.
Review round of dbb52561: Scenario#65.01 has a plain Given/When/Then now, and both hints are fixed in bcdf1b6.
Fixed in bcdf1b6: Scenario#65.03 covers --no-llm too, as the test does.
Split as suggested: Scenario#131.01 covers the precedence of an explicit werkdock section in builds, the new Scenario#131.02 the legacy branches entry, each with its own test; the warning scenario…