• Joined on 2026-09-02
mi pushed to claude-code/billed-provider-usage at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 12:09:54 +02:00
da58178088 fix: a non-UTF-8 answer of the statistics service never breaks the report
mi pushed to claude-code/billed-provider-usage at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 12:08:56 +02:00
0eaede8e11 fix: billed import in one transaction, malformed CSV named as such, Scenario#24.04 concrete
mi pushed to claude-code/billed-provider-usage at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 12:03:49 +02:00
3b82847c06 fix: no billed import without a usage record, body limit with room for a full batch
mi pushed to claude-code/billed-provider-usage at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 12:01:36 +02:00
ab5cfce19f fix: calls of the first run with a usage record are skipped, the billed line fits one line
mi pushed to claude-code/billed-provider-usage at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 11:58:17 +02:00
5972e03fad werkrevisor 0.18.3: billed OpenRouter calls fill the time before the statistics service
mi created branch claude-code/billed-provider-usage in mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 11:58:17 +02:00
mi pushed to claude-code/token-statistics at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 11:38:06 +02:00
912d505b17 review: PR#23 doc derives the input share and names the usage record that the tool sends
mi pushed to claude-code/token-statistics at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 11:37:21 +02:00
78ffc42065 werkrevisor 0.18.2: input and output tokens per model in the dashboard
mi pushed to claude-code/token-statistics at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 11:32:52 +02:00
df1a4a962b PR#23 doc: the dashboard shows input and output tokens per model
mi created branch claude-code/token-statistics in mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 11:32:52 +02:00
mi pushed to claude-code/estimated-costs-and-split at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 11:26:43 +02:00
8210e66d13 review: the service decides whether the LLM part is estimated, the dashboard only shows it
mi pushed to claude-code/estimated-costs-and-split at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 11:25:24 +02:00
21d05a0c16 review: the LLM line marks unknown parts with ≈, the Jev line always shows ≈
mi pushed to claude-code/estimated-costs-and-split at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 11:24:19 +02:00
f9d84c09bf review: PR#22 Scenario#22.02 example matches the display
mi pushed to claude-code/estimated-costs-and-split at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 11:23:36 +02:00
dbd7ad3838 review: on a narrow screen a table scrolls inside its section, never the page
mi pushed to claude-code/estimated-costs-and-split at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 11:22:17 +02:00
10b016df0e review: a sum without an unknown LLM part is marked ≈ as well
mi pushed to claude-code/estimated-costs-and-split at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 11:20:49 +02:00
eac2c70e3a review: every amount carries = or ≈, without extra words; the 30-day test checks both parts again
mi pushed to claude-code/estimated-costs-and-split at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 11:14:52 +02:00
2d1f2fc640 review: a recent review with unknown LLM costs shows its Jev part like the sums do
mi pushed to claude-code/estimated-costs-and-split at mi/werkrevisor 2026-10-06 11:13:23 +02:00
a799395736 werkrevisor 0.18.1: estimated costs marked, LLM and Jev listed apart