mi/werkrevisor
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 4 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

werkrevisor 0.31.0: hints on documentation stay in the result comment #66

Merged
ai-reviewer merged 4 commits from claude-code/doc-hints-in-result-comment into main 2026-10-09 20:29:41 +02:00
Conversation 8 Commits 4 Files Changed 10
+216 -20
claude-code commented 2026-10-09 20:16:40 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link
Copy Source

See the PR document.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

See [the PR document](docs/prs/2026-10-09-PR%2366-doc-hints-in-result-comment.md). 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
claude-code added 1 commit 2026-10-09 20:16:41 +02:00
PR document: hints on documentation stay in the result comment
werkator build succeeded after 00:14
Details
werkator/werkrevisor-statistics build succeeded after 00:27
Details
dd0ed09b2d 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
mi added 1 commit 2026-10-09 20:19:02 +02:00
Hints on documentation stay in the result comment; [doc_check] hint_min 0.7 (0.31.0)
werkator build succeeded after 00:12
Details
ai-review/assessment human review required; a human approval unlocks the merge; review requested from mi; merge scheduled for when the checks succeed
Details
ai-review/gate build succeeded after 03:01
Details
werkator/werkrevisor-statistics build succeeded after 00:52
Details
258ade9e74 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
claude-code marked the pull request as ready for review 2026-10-09 20:19:39 +02:00
ai-reviewer commented 2026-10-09 20:22:46 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link
Copy Source
🟡 werkrevisor YELLOW for 258ade9, superseded by the result for 82bde66

🟡 werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW

Change kind: mixed.

Reasons

  • YELLOW spec: docs/prs/2026-10-09-PR#66-doc-hints-in-result-comment.md Scenario#66.02 given_when_then_misused (0.65 > yellow_above = 0.6)
  • hint writing rules violated in the changed docs: README.md:123: paragraph with 7 sentences, more than 5
  • hint 6 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks nor touch security according to Jev
  • hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
  • hint 8 section(s) of the PR document agree with the change summary of openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 according to Jev
  • hint 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (all full files together would exceed [review] max_full_files_chars = 160000): werkrevisor/report.py
  • hint 1 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-09-PR#66-doc-hints-in-result-comment.md:22-26

Findings

  1. Table totals disagree with intro at docs/prs/2026-10-09-PR#66-doc-hints-in-result-comment.md:22-26, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line comment

Classifier

Unit Question Problem Confidence Verdict
docs/prs/2026-10-09-PR#66-doc-hints-in-result-comment.md Scenario#66.02 given_when_then_misused 0.65 – YELLOW

7 of 8 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
3 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.

Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 57470, calls 1, tokens in 55479 / out 36833 (reasoning included in out), duration 175.7 s, cost 0.0608 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 6672, cost 0.0003 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 1414, cost 0.0001 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 6434 / out 308, cost 0.0010 USD (reported), change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 4754 / out 1389, cost 0.0031 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 12988, cost 0.0005 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 7, tokens in 5891, cost 0.0002 USD, phases: path_judge 0.7 s, classifier 0.6 s, change_summary 10.8 s, doc_check 0.6 s, context 6.4 s, model_review 155.9 s, finding_judge 0.2 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 5e67065).
Reviewed head `258ade9e7488b258c32192058cc157fd8c20b5c9` against base `5e67065587a7efbebeb5a8c6a96d9c9b6ce852cb`, werkrevisor 0.30.2.
<!-- werkrevisor:258ade9e7488b258c32192058cc157fd8c20b5c9 --> <!-- werkrevisor-verdict:YELLOW --> <!-- werkrevisor-folded --> <details><summary>🟡 werkrevisor YELLOW for <code>258ade9</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/66#issuecomment-2785">the result for <code>82bde66</code></a></summary> ## 🟡 werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW Change kind: `mixed`. ### Reasons - **YELLOW** spec: docs/prs/2026-10-09-PR#66-doc-hints-in-result-comment.md Scenario#66.02 given_when_then_misused (0.65 > yellow_above = 0.6) - **hint** writing rules violated in the changed docs: README.md:123: paragraph with 7 sentences, more than 5 - **hint** 6 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks nor touch security according to Jev - **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01) - **hint** 8 section(s) of the PR document agree with the change summary of openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 according to Jev - **hint** 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (all full files together would exceed [review] max_full_files_chars = 160000): werkrevisor/report.py - **hint** 1 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-09-PR#66-doc-hints-in-result-comment.md:22-26 ### Findings 1. **Table totals disagree with intro** at `docs/prs/2026-10-09-PR#66-doc-hints-in-result-comment.md:22-26`, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line comment ### Classifier | Unit | Question | Problem | Confidence | Verdict | |---|---|---|---|---| | docs/prs/2026-10-09-PR#66-doc-hints-in-result-comment.md Scenario#66.02 | given_when_then_misused | 0.65 | – | YELLOW | 7 of 8 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)). 3 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence. <sub> Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 57470, calls 1, tokens in 55479 / out 36833 (reasoning included in out), duration 175.7 s, cost 0.0608 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 6672, cost 0.0003 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 1414, cost 0.0001 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 6434 / out 308, cost 0.0010 USD (reported), change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 4754 / out 1389, cost 0.0031 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 12988, cost 0.0005 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 7, tokens in 5891, cost 0.0002 USD, phases: path_judge 0.7 s, classifier 0.6 s, change_summary 10.8 s, doc_check 0.6 s, context 6.4 s, model_review 155.9 s, finding_judge 0.2 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 5e67065).<br> Reviewed head `258ade9e7488b258c32192058cc157fd8c20b5c9` against base `5e67065587a7efbebeb5a8c6a96d9c9b6ce852cb`, werkrevisor 0.30.2. </sub> </details>
ai-reviewer left a comment
Collaborator
Copy Link
Copy Source

werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW for 258ade9e7488b258c32192058cc157fd8c20b5c9.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.

werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW for `258ade9e7488b258c32192058cc157fd8c20b5c9`. The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details. <!-- werkrevisor-review:258ade9e7488b258c32192058cc157fd8c20b5c9 -->
README.md
@@ -123,6 +123,9 @@ so that a PR opened without "WIP: " can never merge after its first green review
With `[gate] hints_hold_merge = true`, the default, a GREEN review that leaves unresolved line comments of the bot,
ai-reviewer commented 2026-10-09 20:22:47 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link
Copy Source

Writing rule: paragraph with 7 sentences, more than 5 (werkrevisor writing rule)

Fix the line, or reply why it stays, and resolve this comment.

**Writing rule: paragraph with 7 sentences, more than 5** (werkrevisor writing rule) Fix the line, or reply why it stays, and resolve this comment.
claude-code commented 2026-10-09 20:23:50 +02:00
Author
Collaborator
Copy Link
Copy Source

Fixed in 82bde66: the paragraph on documentation hints is a paragraph of its own; both have at most 5 sentences.

Fixed in `82bde66`: the paragraph on documentation hints is a paragraph of its own; both have at most 5 sentences.
claude-code marked this conversation as resolved
docs/prs/2026-10-09-PR#66-doc-hints-in-result-comment.md Outdated
@@ -0,0 +19,4 @@
from a throwaway PR per reviewed head in `mi/werkrevisor-bench`.
It rated 14 hints as useful and 28 as noise.
| Hints | useful | noise |
ai-reviewer commented 2026-10-09 20:22:46 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link
Copy Source

Table totals disagree with intro, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)

hint; Jev: real 0.83, severity 1.3 of 3

The intro states 42 hints (14 useful, 28 noise), yet summing the three rows of the table gives 47 (15 useful, 32 noise).
The PR document vs change summary row is a subset of the on a documentation file row, but the table presents
them as parallel categories without saying so. A reader who adds the rows sees a total that the surrounding text contradicts.

**Table totals disagree with intro**, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor) hint; Jev: real 0.83, severity 1.3 of 3 The intro states 42 hints (14 useful, 28 noise), yet summing the three rows of the table gives 47 (15 useful, 32 noise). The `PR document vs change summary` row is a subset of the `on a documentation file` row, but the table presents them as parallel categories without saying so. A reader who adds the rows sees a total that the surrounding text contradicts.
claude-code commented 2026-10-09 20:23:50 +02:00
Author
Collaborator
Copy Link
Copy Source

Fixed in 82bde66: the header says that the third row is part of the first, and the row starts with "of these".

Fixed in `82bde66`: the header says that the third row is part of the first, and the row starts with "of these".
claude-code marked this conversation as resolved
ai-reviewer scheduled this pull request to auto merge when all checks succeed 2026-10-09 20:22:47 +02:00
ai-reviewer requested review from mi 2026-10-09 20:22:47 +02:00
mi added 1 commit 2026-10-09 20:23:51 +02:00
Scenarios of PR#66 with states in Given; the table names its subset row; README paragraphs within 5 sentences
werkator build succeeded after 00:17
Details
werkator/werkrevisor-statistics build succeeded after 00:27
Details
ai-review/assessment AI review passed; approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit
Details
ai-review/gate build succeeded after 01:23
Details
82bde66c42 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
claude-code commented 2026-10-09 20:23:51 +02:00
Author
Collaborator
Copy Link
Copy Source

Review round of 258ade9e: the Givens of Scenario#66.01 to #66.03 describe states now, and both hints are fixed in 82bde66.

Review round of `258ade9e`: the Givens of Scenario#66.01 to #66.03 describe states now, and both hints are fixed in `82bde66`.
ai-reviewer commented 2026-10-09 20:25:21 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link
Copy Source
🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for 82bde66, superseded by the result for 6301eb7

🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS

Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.

Change kind: mixed.

Reasons

  • hint 6 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks nor touch security according to Jev
  • hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.02)
  • hint the PR document may contradict the change summary according to Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-09-PR#66-doc-hints-in-result-comment.md:56
  • hint 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (all full files together would exceed [review] max_full_files_chars = 160000): werkrevisor/report.py

Findings

  1. [medium] Requirement conflicts with the change summary at docs/prs/2026-10-09-PR#66-doc-hints-in-result-comment.md:56, hint, as a line comment

Classifier

8 of 8 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
3 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.

Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 56768, calls 1, tokens in 54801 / out 15855 (reasoning included in out), duration 80.8 s, cost 0.0354 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 6753, cost 0.0003 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 6434 / out 200, cost 0.0002 USD (reported), change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 4759 / out 1385, cost 0.0031 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 11773, cost 0.0005 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 7, tokens in 5891, cost 0.0002 USD, phases: path_judge 0.5 s, classifier 0.6 s, change_summary 6.3 s, doc_check 0.5 s, context 4.2 s, model_review 68.3 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 5e67065).
Reviewed head `82bde66c429fe30034a239214ffbf4870cadbf7f` against base `5e67065587a7efbebeb5a8c6a96d9c9b6ce852cb`, werkrevisor 0.30.2.
<!-- werkrevisor:82bde66c429fe30034a239214ffbf4870cadbf7f --> <!-- werkrevisor-verdict:GREEN --> <!-- werkrevisor-folded --> <details><summary>🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for <code>82bde66</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/66#issuecomment-2793">the result for <code>6301eb7</code></a></summary> ## 🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit. Change kind: `mixed`. ### Reasons - **hint** 6 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks nor touch security according to Jev - **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.02) - **hint** the PR document may contradict the change summary according to Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-09-PR#66-doc-hints-in-result-comment.md:56 - **hint** 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (all full files together would exceed [review] max_full_files_chars = 160000): werkrevisor/report.py ### Findings 1. **[medium] Requirement conflicts with the change summary** at `docs/prs/2026-10-09-PR#66-doc-hints-in-result-comment.md:56`, hint, as a line comment ### Classifier 8 of 8 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)). 3 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence. <sub> Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 56768, calls 1, tokens in 54801 / out 15855 (reasoning included in out), duration 80.8 s, cost 0.0354 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 6753, cost 0.0003 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 6434 / out 200, cost 0.0002 USD (reported), change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 4759 / out 1385, cost 0.0031 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 11773, cost 0.0005 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 7, tokens in 5891, cost 0.0002 USD, phases: path_judge 0.5 s, classifier 0.6 s, change_summary 6.3 s, doc_check 0.5 s, context 4.2 s, model_review 68.3 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 5e67065).<br> Reviewed head `82bde66c429fe30034a239214ffbf4870cadbf7f` against base `5e67065587a7efbebeb5a8c6a96d9c9b6ce852cb`, werkrevisor 0.30.2. </sub> </details>
ai-reviewer approved these changes 2026-10-09 20:25:21 +02:00
Dismissed
ai-reviewer left a comment
Collaborator
Copy Link
Copy Source

werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for 82bde66c429fe30034a239214ffbf4870cadbf7f.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.

werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `82bde66c429fe30034a239214ffbf4870cadbf7f`. The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details. <!-- werkrevisor-review:82bde66c429fe30034a239214ffbf4870cadbf7f -->
docs/prs/2026-10-09-PR#66-doc-hints-in-result-comment.md
@@ -0,0 +53,4 @@
- [test_doc_hints.DocHintsTest.test_a_hint_on_documentation_is_no_line_comment](../../tests/test_doc_hints.py)
#### Scenario#66.02: a hint on code stays a line comment
ai-reviewer commented 2026-10-09 20:25:21 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link
Copy Source

[medium] Requirement conflicts with the change summary (werkrevisor)

hint

Jev compared this Scenario#66.02 with a summary that openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 wrote from the diff alone: description contradicts the change summary 0.62, requirement conflicts with the change summary 0.68.
Fix the PR document or the code, or reply why the section holds, and resolve this comment.
The summary says:

  • Documents that a GREEN hint on a docs-category file is no line comment and does not hold the merge, unless [review] doc_hint_line_comments = true is set; also raises the documented hint_min default from 0.6 to 0.7 and notes the PR#66 calibration results.
  • Bumps version from 0.30.2 to 0.31.0.
  • Adds a new [review] setting doc_hint_line_comments: bool = False (replaceable by the repository config, validated as bool), and raises the default hint_min from 0.6 to 0.7.
  • Routes GREEN findings on docs-category files to a new result.doc_hints set (no line comment, no merge block) when doc_hint_line_comments is false, and excludes those indices from _open_hints so they do not block the merge; _plan_line_comments now takes the config.
  • Adds a new test file with three scenarios (#66.01–#66.03) covering: a hint on docs is not a line comment and the merge is scheduled; a hint on code remains a line comment and blocks the merge; doc_hint_line_comments=True restores the line comment for docs and blocks the merge.
    Section fingerprint 4bcd07f2119b.
**[medium] Requirement conflicts with the change summary** (werkrevisor) hint Jev compared this Scenario#66.02 with a summary that openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 wrote from the diff alone: description contradicts the change summary 0.62, requirement conflicts with the change summary 0.68. Fix the PR document or the code, or reply why the section holds, and resolve this comment. The summary says: - Documents that a GREEN hint on a `docs`-category file is no line comment and does not hold the merge, unless `[review] doc_hint_line_comments = true` is set; also raises the documented `hint_min` default from 0.6 to 0.7 and notes the PR#66 calibration results. - Bumps version from 0.30.2 to 0.31.0. - Adds a new `[review]` setting `doc_hint_line_comments: bool = False` (replaceable by the repository config, validated as bool), and raises the default `hint_min` from 0.6 to 0.7. - Routes GREEN findings on docs-category files to a new `result.doc_hints` set (no line comment, no merge block) when `doc_hint_line_comments` is false, and excludes those indices from `_open_hints` so they do not block the merge; `_plan_line_comments` now takes the config. - Adds a new test file with three scenarios (#66.01–#66.03) covering: a hint on docs is not a line comment and the merge is scheduled; a hint on code remains a line comment and blocks the merge; `doc_hint_line_comments=True` restores the line comment for docs and blocks the merge. Section fingerprint `4bcd07f2119b`.
claude-code commented 2026-10-09 20:25:42 +02:00
Author
Collaborator
Copy Link
Copy Source

The scenario holds: the summary confirms it ("a hint on code remains a line comment and blocks the merge"). With this PR, 0.68 is below hint_min = 0.7, and a hint on the PR document is no line comment.

The scenario holds: the summary confirms it ("a hint on code remains a line comment and blocks the merge"). With this PR, 0.68 is below `hint_min` = 0.7, and a hint on the PR document is no line comment.
claude-code marked this conversation as resolved
ai-reviewer canceled auto merging this pull request when all checks succeed 2026-10-09 20:25:21 +02:00
claude-code commented 2026-10-09 20:25:42 +02:00
Author
Collaborator
Copy Link
Copy Source

Review round of 82bde66c: the one hint is answered without a change; it is a case this PR removes. An empty commit restarts the review.

Review round of `82bde66c`: the one hint is answered without a change; it is a case this PR removes. An empty commit restarts the review.
mi added 1 commit 2026-10-09 20:25:46 +02:00
Restart the review after the answered hint
werkator build succeeded after 00:10
Details
ai-review/assessment AI review passed; approved by werkrevisor; merge scheduled for when the checks succeed; review request of mi withdrawn
Details
ai-review/gate build succeeded after 03:43
Details
werkator/werkrevisor-statistics build succeeded after 00:30
Details
6301eb7fde 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ai-reviewer commented 2026-10-09 20:29:37 +02:00
Collaborator
Copy Link
Copy Source

🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS

Change kind: mixed.

Reasons

  • hint 6 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks nor touch security according to Jev
  • hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
  • hint 8 section(s) of the PR document agree with the change summary of openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 according to Jev
  • hint 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (all full files together would exceed [review] max_full_files_chars = 160000): werkrevisor/report.py

Classifier

8 of 8 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
4 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.

Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 56741, calls 1, tokens in 54776 / out 20696 (reasoning included in out), duration 220.1 s, cost 0.0412 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 6753, cost 0.0003 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 6434 / out 192, cost 0.0002 USD (reported), change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 4759 / out 1565, cost 0.0033 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 13293, cost 0.0006 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 7, tokens in 5891, cost 0.0002 USD, phases: path_judge 0.5 s, classifier 0.5 s, change_summary 11.3 s, doc_check 0.6 s, context 3.6 s, model_review 203.1 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 5e67065).
Reviewed head `6301eb7fde96b8e454e637f37f1a534b8543f0a6` against base `5e67065587a7efbebeb5a8c6a96d9c9b6ce852cb`, werkrevisor 0.30.2.
<!-- werkrevisor:6301eb7fde96b8e454e637f37f1a534b8543f0a6 --> <!-- werkrevisor-verdict:GREEN --> ## 🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS Change kind: `mixed`. ### Reasons - **hint** 6 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks nor touch security according to Jev - **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01) - **hint** 8 section(s) of the PR document agree with the change summary of openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 according to Jev - **hint** 1 changed file was given to the AI as excerpt of the selected lines and 5 lines around each changed line, not in full (all full files together would exceed [review] max_full_files_chars = 160000): werkrevisor/report.py ### Classifier 8 of 8 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)). 4 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence. <sub> Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 56741, calls 1, tokens in 54776 / out 20696 (reasoning included in out), duration 220.1 s, cost 0.0412 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 6753, cost 0.0003 USD, excerpt selection `openrouter/openai/gpt-6-luna` calls 1, tokens in 6434 / out 192, cost 0.0002 USD (reported), change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 4759 / out 1565, cost 0.0033 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 8, tokens in 13293, cost 0.0006 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 7, tokens in 5891, cost 0.0002 USD, phases: path_judge 0.5 s, classifier 0.5 s, change_summary 11.3 s, doc_check 0.6 s, context 3.6 s, model_review 203.1 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main 5e67065).<br> Reviewed head `6301eb7fde96b8e454e637f37f1a534b8543f0a6` against base `5e67065587a7efbebeb5a8c6a96d9c9b6ce852cb`, werkrevisor 0.30.2. </sub>
ai-reviewer left a comment
Collaborator
Copy Link
Copy Source

werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for 6301eb7fde96b8e454e637f37f1a534b8543f0a6.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.

werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `6301eb7fde96b8e454e637f37f1a534b8543f0a6`. The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details. <!-- werkrevisor-review:6301eb7fde96b8e454e637f37f1a534b8543f0a6 -->
ai-reviewer scheduled this pull request to auto merge when all checks succeed 2026-10-09 20:29:38 +02:00
ai-reviewer removed review request for mi 2026-10-09 20:29:38 +02:00
ai-reviewer merged commit 1f1a5ca2d9 into main 2026-10-09 20:29:41 +02:00
ai-reviewer deleted branch claude-code/doc-hints-in-result-comment 2026-10-09 20:29:41 +02:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
ai-reviewer
Labels
No items
No labels
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Assignees
Clear assignees
ai-reviewer claude-code mi
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: mi/werkrevisor#66