the diagrams show how a review runs today #55
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: mi/werkrevisor#55
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
See the PR document.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for
e4cee2f, superseded by the result for7684bf2🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 2 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind:
docs_only.Reasons
Findings
Misplaced step content at
README.md:216, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line commentMisplaced step content at
README.md:218, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line commentClassifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 8261, calls 1, tokens in 8052 / out 21448 (reasoning included in out), duration 108.3 s, cost 0.0281 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2786, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 2, tokens in 3453, cost 0.0001 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` calls 1, tokens in 3519 / out 584, cost 0.0017 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 5634, cost 0.0002 USD, phases: classifier 0.3 s, change_summary 8.2 s, doc_check 0.4 s, context 0.1 s, model_review 98.6 s, finding_judge 0.3 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main167a3ae).Reviewed head `e4cee2f3509cc5c065bb72ca07ef31a8c764dd92` against base `167a3ae80cd5d62938d2f0e6e66852e72775ed85`, werkrevisor 0.26.0.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
e4cee2f3509cc5c065bb72ca07ef31a8c764dd92.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
@@ -218,7 +213,9 @@ A secret in the diff keeps it from Jev and from the LLM; a failed Jev call neverA count above the effective input limit (see [`[budget]`](#budget)) gives YELLOW without a model call.6. Query the OpenRouter key budget.Too little budget gives ERROR without a model call.Jev judges each finding of the model: real defect, severity and, with a risk template, its risk category.Misplaced step content, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.89, severity 1.6 of 3
The sentence about Jev judging each finding of the model was appended as a sub-bullet of step 6 (Query the OpenRouter key budget), but it describes the JFIND node in the flow diagram, which is executed after the PR-Agent review (step 5) and after the budget check. The budget step is performed before the model is called, so findings do not yet exist at that point. Placing the Jev-judges-findings sentence under step 6 makes the order of operations confusing and contradicts the flow diagram, which shows JFIND as a distinct step that takes the model output as input.
Fixed: judging the findings and combining risks and findings are now steps 8 and 9 of their own, after the coverage check, in the order of the diagram.
@@ -220,2 +215,4 @@Too little budget gives ERROR without a model call.Jev judges each finding of the model: real defect, severity and, with a risk template, its risk category.7. Check that the model saw every changed file completely.Combine the risks and the findings: a very likely risk and a confirmed finding in the same file or category give RED.Misplaced step content, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.84, severity 1.7 of 3
The sentence about combining the risks and the findings was appended as a sub-bullet of step 7 (Check that the model saw every changed file completely), but it describes the COMBINE node in the flow diagram, which takes input from both JFILE (file risks) and JFIND (judged findings). Combining requires both inputs, so it cannot be a sub-bullet of the coverage check step. This placement contradicts the flow diagram, where COMBINE is a distinct node that follows both JFILE and JFIND.
Fixed: judging the findings and combining risks and findings are now steps 8 and 9 of their own, after the coverage check, in the order of the diagram.
New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Change kind:
docs_only.Reasons
Classifier
4 of 4 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 8541, calls 1, tokens in 8317 / out 17975 (reasoning included in out), duration 221.0 s, cost 0.0240 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2786, cost 0.0001 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` calls 1, tokens in 3578 / out 567, cost 0.0017 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 5378, cost 0.0002 USD, phases: classifier 0.3 s, change_summary 13.9 s, doc_check 0.3 s, context 0.1 s, model_review 206.0 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main1 answer ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
167a3ae).Reviewed head `7684bf2359c56e0b05d172c95c58148e0bc17c61` against base `167a3ae80cd5d62938d2f0e6e66852e72775ed85`, werkrevisor 0.26.0.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
7684bf2359c56e0b05d172c95c58148e0bc17c61.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.