werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW for 2a686336629ef2c7794ff48b5cf8e4f0c2205587.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW for `2a686336629ef2c7794ff48b5cf8e4f0c2205587`.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
<!-- werkrevisor-review:2a686336629ef2c7794ff48b5cf8e4f0c2205587 -->
Missing boundary test, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.65, severity 2.0 of 3
The new test exercises the verdict for 0.84 (above threshold) and 0.68 (below threshold), but does not cover the boundary at 0.75 itself. The PR document specifies the trigger at "at 0.75 or more" (inclusive), so without a third case at 0.75 the inclusivity of the threshold is not directly verified.
**Missing boundary test**, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.65, severity 2.0 of 3
The new test exercises the verdict for 0.84 (above threshold) and 0.68 (below threshold), but does not cover the boundary at 0.75 itself. The PR document specifies the trigger at "at 0.75 or more" (inclusive), so without a third case at 0.75 the inclusivity of the threshold is not directly verified.
This changes the merge-gate policy that determines when human approval is required. Incorrect classifier wording or thresholds could let weakened gates merge automatically, and the mocked tests cannot establish real classifier reliability.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status ai-review/codex: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 175644 (cached 134912) / out 902, 41.0 s, 5 commands; reviewed head `2a686336629ef2c7794ff48b5cf8e4f0c2205587`.
<!-- werkrevisor-codex:2a686336629ef2c7794ff48b5cf8e4f0c2205587 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex-critical:true -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex-unattached:0 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex -->
<!-- werkrevisor-folded -->
<details><summary>⚠️ werkrevisor ERROR for <code>?</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/107#issuecomment-5298">the result for <code>60fa494</code></a></summary>
## Codex review: critical
This changes the merge-gate policy that determines when human approval is required. Incorrect classifier wording or thresholds could let weakened gates merge automatically, and the mocked tests cannot establish real classifier reliability.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status `ai-review/codex`: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.
<sub>
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 175644 (cached 134912) / out 902, 41.0 s, 5 commands; reviewed head `2a686336629ef2c7794ff48b5cf8e4f0c2205587`.
</sub>
</details>
This changes the merge-gate configuration that decides when human approval is required. Errors in the classifier question or threshold could miss weakened gates, and the mocked tests cannot establish real classifier accuracy.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status ai-review/codex: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 248546 (cached 200064) / out 1259, 51.8 s, 11 commands; reviewed head `60fa4949250918b583d362ca5f9d48bc649681c5`.
<!-- werkrevisor-codex:60fa4949250918b583d362ca5f9d48bc649681c5 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex-critical:true -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex-unattached:0 -->
<!-- werkrevisor-codex -->
## Codex review: critical
This changes the merge-gate configuration that decides when human approval is required. Errors in the classifier question or threshold could miss weakened gates, and the mocked tests cannot establish real classifier accuracy.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status `ai-review/codex`: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.
<sub>
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 248546 (cached 200064) / out 1259, 51.8 s, 11 commands; reviewed head `60fa4949250918b583d362ca5f9d48bc649681c5`.
</sub>
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
See the PR document under docs/prs/.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
🟡 werkrevisor YELLOW for
2a68633, superseded by the result for60fa494🟡 werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
Findings
tests/test_risk.py:61-74, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line commentClassifier
8 of 9 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 14343, calls 1, tokens in 13824 / out 19659 (reasoning included in out), duration 244.2 s, cost 0.0277 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 9, tokens in 6866, cost 0.0003 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 1901, cost 0.0001 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 1402 / out 903, cost 0.0015 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 9, tokens in 11060, cost 0.0005 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 3, tokens in 1889, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.7 s, change_summary 10.8 s, doc_check 0.7 s, context 0.2 s, model_review 230.8 s, finding_judge 0.2 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main3 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
643c04c).Reviewed head `2a686336629ef2c7794ff48b5cf8e4f0c2205587` against base `643c04c9f8f5668416ede8d2c71529bb8a6d4cb4`, werkrevisor 0.41.5.
werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW for
2a686336629ef2c7794ff48b5cf8e4f0c2205587.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
@@ -57,6 +58,21 @@ class RiskCategoriesTest(unittest.TestCase):f"Transaction integrity, very likely according to Jev: {APP} (1.00); ""lower the risk, or revert the change because the task does not need it")def test_werkrevisor_holds_a_weakened_gate_for_the_human(self):Missing boundary test, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.65, severity 2.0 of 3
The new test exercises the verdict for 0.84 (above threshold) and 0.68 (below threshold), but does not cover the boundary at 0.75 itself. The PR document specifies the trigger at "at 0.75 or more" (inclusive), so without a third case at 0.75 the inclusivity of the threshold is not directly verified.
Fixed in
60fa494: the test also checks 0.75 (YELLOW) and 0.74 (GREEN).⚠️ werkrevisor ERROR for
?, superseded by the result for60fa494Codex review: critical
This changes the merge-gate policy that determines when human approval is required. Incorrect classifier wording or thresholds could let weakened gates merge automatically, and the mocked tests cannot establish real classifier reliability.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 175644 (cached 134912) / out 902, 41.0 s, 5 commands; reviewed head `2a686336629ef2c7794ff48b5cf8e4f0c2205587`.ai-review/codex: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.🟡 werkrevisor: YELLOW / HUMAN_REVIEW
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
Classifier
9 of 9 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 14434, calls 1, tokens in 13911 / out 15094 (reasoning included in out), duration 421.7 s, cost 0.0223 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 9, tokens in 6916, cost 0.0003 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 1433 / out 708, cost 0.0012 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 9, tokens in 11587, cost 0.0005 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 3, tokens in 1899, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.3 s, classifier 0.7 s, change_summary 10.1 s, doc_check 0.6 s, context 0.3 s, model_review 408.9 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main4 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
643c04c).Reviewed head `60fa4949250918b583d362ca5f9d48bc649681c5` against base `643c04c9f8f5668416ede8d2c71529bb8a6d4cb4`, werkrevisor 0.41.5.
Codex review: critical
This changes the merge-gate configuration that decides when human approval is required. Errors in the classifier question or threshold could miss weakened gates, and the mocked tests cannot establish real classifier accuracy.
No findings.
The merge waits for the status
Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 248546 (cached 200064) / out 1259, 51.8 s, 11 commands; reviewed head `60fa4949250918b583d362ca5f9d48bc649681c5`.ai-review/codex: every line comment resolved, and the approval of a human for a critical PR or for a finding that is only here.