werkrevisor 0.40.2: the docs category of werkregie is doc/ #100

2026-10-13T08:41:08+02:00

claude-code commented

2026-10-13 08:41:08 +02:00

werkregie keeps its documentation in doc/, not docs/.

See the PR document under docs/prs/.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

werkregie keeps its documentation in `doc/`, not `docs/`. See the PR document under `docs/prs/`. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

claude-code added 1 commit 2026-10-13 08:41:08 +02:00

PR document: the docs category of werkregie is doc/ b8570b2221

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

claude-code added 2 commits 2026-10-13 08:41:12 +02:00

PR document: number 100 0ef81f547f

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

werkregie: the docs category is doc/

werkator build succeeded after 00:51

Details

werkator/werkrevisor-statistics build succeeded after 01:14

Details

01b45cd449

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

claude-code added 1 commit 2026-10-13 08:41:25 +02:00

werkrevisor 0.40.2: PR document, plan

werkator build succeeded after 00:30

Details

werkator/werkrevisor-statistics build succeeded after 00:54

Details

ai-review/assessment AI review passed; approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit

Details

ai-review/gate build succeeded after 01:53

Details

c218804a28

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

claude-code marked the pull request as ready for review 2026-10-13 08:44:49 +02:00

ai-reviewer commented

2026-10-13 08:46:47 +02:00

🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for c218804, superseded by the result for d5e31f1

🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS

Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.

Change kind: mixed.

Reasons

hint 3 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks nor touch security according to Jev
hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
hint 5 section(s) of the PR document agree with the change summary of openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 according to Jev
hint 1 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-13-PR#100-werkregie-doc-glob.md:19

Findings

[low] Unclear sentence at docs/prs/2026-10-13-PR#100-werkregie-doc-glob.md:19, hint, as a line comment

Classifier

5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).

_{Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 15185, calls 1, tokens in 14654 / out 8759 (reasoning included in out), duration 110.6 s, cost 0.0149 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3293, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `none` calls 0, tokens in 0, cost 0.0000 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 927 / out 564, cost 0.0009 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 5043, cost 0.0002 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2099, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.2 s, classifier 0.5 s, change_summary 9.5 s, doc_check 0.5 s, context 0.3 s, model_review 99.3 s, finding_judge 0.0 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main df376a0).

Reviewed head `c218804a28b3d25f2826be4aa38728eaef33ae02` against base `df376a0b06d13fc56e6d065d00623e6ac6aa9ccf`, werkrevisor 0.40.1.}

<details><summary>🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for <code>c218804</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/100#issuecomment-5044">the result for <code>d5e31f1</code></a></summary> ## 🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit. Change kind: `mixed`. ### Reasons - **hint** 3 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks nor touch security according to Jev - **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01) - **hint** 5 section(s) of the PR document agree with the change summary of openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 according to Jev - **hint** 1 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-13-PR#100-werkregie-doc-glob.md:19 ### Findings 1. **[low] Unclear sentence** at `docs/prs/2026-10-13-PR#100-werkregie-doc-glob.md:19`, hint, as a line comment ### Classifier 5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)). Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 15185, calls 1, tokens in 14654 / out 8759 (reasoning included in out), duration 110.6 s, cost 0.0149 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3293, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `none` calls 0, tokens in 0, cost 0.0000 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 927 / out 564, cost 0.0009 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 5043, cost 0.0002 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2099, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.2 s, classifier 0.5 s, change_summary 9.5 s, doc_check 0.5 s, context 0.3 s, model_review 99.3 s, finding_judge 0.0 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main df376a0). Reviewed head `c218804a28b3d25f2826be4aa38728eaef33ae02` against base `df376a0b06d13fc56e6d065d00623e6ac6aa9ccf`, werkrevisor 0.40.1. </details>

ai-reviewer approved these changes

2026-10-13 08:46:47 +02:00

Dismissed

ai-reviewer left a comment

werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for c218804a28b3d25f2826be4aa38728eaef33ae02.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.

werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `c218804a28b3d25f2826be4aa38728eaef33ae02`. The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.

docs/prs/2026-10-13-PR#100-werkregie-doc-glob.md Outdated

						
				@@ -0,0 +16,4 @@

				## Solution

				`[categories] docs` of werkregie is `["**/*.md", "doc/**"]`, as `docs/**` is for werkrevisor.

ai-reviewer commented

2026-10-13 08:46:47 +02:00

[low] Unclear sentence (werkrevisor)

hint

The sentence in the Solution section "[categories] docs of werkregie is ["**/*.md", "doc/**"], as docs/** is for werkrevisor" is unclear. The "as" reads like a reason, but the relationship between werkregie's doc/** and werkrevisor's docs/** is a contrast between two repositories, not a cause. Werkregie uses doc/** because its documentation lives in doc/, not because werkrevisor uses docs/**. A clearer phrasing would separate the description of werkregie's docs category from the comparison with werkrevisor.

**[low] Unclear sentence** (werkrevisor) hint The sentence in the Solution section "`[categories] docs` of werkregie is `["**/*.md", "doc/**"]`, as `docs/**` is for werkrevisor" is unclear. The "as" reads like a reason, but the relationship between werkregie's `doc/**` and werkrevisor's `docs/**` is a contrast between two repositories, not a cause. Werkregie uses `doc/**` because its documentation lives in `doc/`, not because werkrevisor uses `docs/**`. A clearer phrasing would separate the description of werkregie's docs category from the comparison with werkrevisor.

claude-code commented

2026-10-13 08:47:13 +02:00

Fixed in d5e31f1: the sentence now gives the reason, the directory of the werkregie documentation, without the comparison.

Fixed in `d5e31f1`: the sentence now gives the reason, the directory of the werkregie documentation, without the comparison.

claude-code marked this conversation as resolved

claude-code added 1 commit 2026-10-13 08:47:13 +02:00

PR document: the reason for doc/

werkator build succeeded after 00:20

Details

ai-review/assessment AI review passed; approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 2 open hint(s): answer the 2 hint(s) that stand only in the result comment in a PR comment, then restart the review or push a commit

Details

ai-review/gate build succeeded after 01:02

Details

werkator/werkrevisor-statistics build succeeded after 01:11

Details

d5e31f1342

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

claude-code dismissed ai-reviewer's review 2026-10-13 08:47:13 +02:00

Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

ai-reviewer commented

2026-10-13 08:48:23 +02:00

🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for d5e31f1, superseded by the result for 825c477

🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS

Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 2 open hint(s): answer the 2 hint(s) that stand only in the result comment in a PR comment, then restart the review or push a commit.

Change kind: mixed.

Reasons

hint approval of werkrevisor for c218804 not carried over: 1 approved block(s) are missing
hint 3 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks nor touch security according to Jev
hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
hint 5 section(s) of the PR document agree with the change summary of openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 according to Jev
hint 2 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: tests/test_config_budget_redact.py, config/werkregie.toml
hint model recommends merge with caution

Findings

Insufficient regression test at tests/test_config_budget_redact.py, severity unknown, counted as medium

hint; Jev: real 0.74, severity 2.0 of 3

The new test test_the_plan_of_each_repository_is_documentation is claimed in the PR document to "fail for werkregie without the fix", but it actually passes either way. The docs category starts with **/*.md, and ** matches any directory segments, so doc/werkregie.werkbaum (or any .md file at any depth) is already categorized as "docs" before the doc/** pattern is ever consulted. To make the test a real regression test, either the **/*.md entry must be removed from docs, or the assertion should use a path that only the doc/** pattern can match.
Violated header invariant at config/werkregie.toml, severity unknown, counted as medium

hint; Jev: real 0.63, severity 1.6 of 3

The header comment of config/werkregie.toml states "It is complete, so the review works without a .werkrevisor.toml in werkregie; the PR never changes this file." This PR changes the file, contradicting that invariant. If this host config is meant to be modified in exceptional cases, the comment should be updated to reflect that; otherwise the change should be done elsewhere.

Classifier

5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).

_{Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 15186, calls 1, tokens in 14655 / out 4176 (reasoning included in out), duration 57.6 s, cost 0.0094 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3294, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 2, tokens in 1109, cost 0.0000 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 927 / out 781, cost 0.0010 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 5259, cost 0.0002 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2099, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.3 s, classifier 0.5 s, change_summary 10.6 s, doc_check 0.7 s, context 0.4 s, model_review 44.3 s, finding_judge 0.3 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main df376a0).

Reviewed head `d5e31f1342320363f6f0dcb87013209c47150508` against base `df376a0b06d13fc56e6d065d00623e6ac6aa9ccf`, werkrevisor 0.40.1.}

<details><summary>🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for <code>d5e31f1</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/100#issuecomment-5050">the result for <code>825c477</code></a></summary> ## 🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 2 open hint(s): answer the 2 hint(s) that stand only in the result comment in a PR comment, then restart the review or push a commit. Change kind: `mixed`. ### Reasons - **hint** approval of werkrevisor for `c218804` not carried over: 1 approved block(s) are missing - **hint** 3 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks nor touch security according to Jev - **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01) - **hint** 5 section(s) of the PR document agree with the change summary of openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 according to Jev - **hint** 2 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: tests/test_config_budget_redact.py, config/werkregie.toml - **hint** model recommends merge with caution ### Findings 1. **Insufficient regression test** at `tests/test_config_budget_redact.py`, severity unknown, counted as medium hint; Jev: real 0.74, severity 2.0 of 3 The new test `test_the_plan_of_each_repository_is_documentation` is claimed in the PR document to "fail for werkregie without the fix", but it actually passes either way. The `docs` category starts with `**/*.md`, and `**` matches any directory segments, so `doc/werkregie.werkbaum` (or any .md file at any depth) is already categorized as "docs" before the `doc/**` pattern is ever consulted. To make the test a real regression test, either the `**/*.md` entry must be removed from `docs`, or the assertion should use a path that only the `doc/**` pattern can match. 2. **Violated header invariant** at `config/werkregie.toml`, severity unknown, counted as medium hint; Jev: real 0.63, severity 1.6 of 3 The header comment of `config/werkregie.toml` states "It is complete, so the review works without a .werkrevisor.toml in werkregie; the PR never changes this file." This PR changes the file, contradicting that invariant. If this host config is meant to be modified in exceptional cases, the comment should be updated to reflect that; otherwise the change should be done elsewhere. ### Classifier 5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)). Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 15186, calls 1, tokens in 14655 / out 4176 (reasoning included in out), duration 57.6 s, cost 0.0094 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3294, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 2, tokens in 1109, cost 0.0000 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 927 / out 781, cost 0.0010 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 5259, cost 0.0002 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2099, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.3 s, classifier 0.5 s, change_summary 10.6 s, doc_check 0.7 s, context 0.4 s, model_review 44.3 s, finding_judge 0.3 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main df376a0). Reviewed head `d5e31f1342320363f6f0dcb87013209c47150508` against base `df376a0b06d13fc56e6d065d00623e6ac6aa9ccf`, werkrevisor 0.40.1. </details>

ai-reviewer approved these changes

2026-10-13 08:48:23 +02:00

Dismissed

ai-reviewer left a comment

werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for d5e31f1342320363f6f0dcb87013209c47150508.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.

werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `d5e31f1342320363f6f0dcb87013209c47150508`. The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.

ai-reviewer commented

2026-10-13 08:50:14 +02:00

⚠️ werkrevisor ERROR for ?, superseded by the result for 825c477

Codex review: critical

The change exempts files under werkregie’s doc/ directory from code-risk classification and review size limits, changing the merge gate’s coverage and requiring human review. The new regression test passes locally, but the prescribed Docker test suite could not run because Docker access was denied.

No findings.

This review only advises; it holds no merge.

_{Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 168360 (cached 131584) / out 773, 52.3 s, 5 commands; reviewed head `d5e31f1342320363f6f0dcb87013209c47150508`.}

<details><summary>⚠️ werkrevisor ERROR for <code>?</code>, superseded by <a href="http://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/100#issuecomment-5050">the result for <code>825c477</code></a></summary> ## Codex review: critical The change exempts files under werkregie’s doc/ directory from code-risk classification and review size limits, changing the merge gate’s coverage and requiring human review. The new regression test passes locally, but the prescribed Docker test suite could not run because Docker access was denied. No findings. This review only advises; it holds no merge. Model `gpt-6-astra`, effort high, tokens in 168360 (cached 131584) / out 773, 52.3 s, 5 commands; reviewed head `d5e31f1342320363f6f0dcb87013209c47150508`. </details>

claude-code commented

2026-10-13 08:51:16 +02:00

Answers to the two hints of the review of d5e31f1:

Insufficient regression test: not changed. doc/werkregie.werkbaum does not match **/*.md, since it does not end in .md. Without the fix, the test failed: AssertionError: 'other' != 'docs' for werkregie.toml (test added in 01b45cd).
Header invariant: fixed in 825c477. The header meant a PR of werkregie, which reads its review rules from this file; it now says so.

Answers to the two hints of the review of `d5e31f1`: 1. Insufficient regression test: not changed. `doc/werkregie.werkbaum` does not match `**/*.md`, since it does not end in `.md`. Without the fix, the test failed: `AssertionError: 'other' != 'docs'` for `werkregie.toml` (test added in `01b45cd`). 2. Header invariant: fixed in `825c477`. The header meant a PR of werkregie, which reads its review rules from this file; it now says so.

claude-code added 1 commit 2026-10-13 08:51:17 +02:00

werkregie host config: the header names the PRs of werkregie

werkator build succeeded after 00:28

Details

werkator/werkrevisor-statistics build succeeded after 00:45

Details

ai-review/assessment AI review passed; approved by werkrevisor; merge scheduled for when the checks succeed

Details

ai-review/gate build succeeded after 02:04

Details

825c477956

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

claude-code dismissed ai-reviewer's review 2026-10-13 08:51:17 +02:00

Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

ai-reviewer commented

2026-10-13 08:53:28 +02:00

🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS

Change kind: mixed.

Reasons

hint approval of werkrevisor for d5e31f1 not carried over: 1 approved block(s) are missing
hint 3 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks nor touch security according to Jev
hint 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01)
hint 5 section(s) of the PR document agree with the change summary of openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 according to Jev
hint 1 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-13-PR#100-werkregie-doc-glob.md:20

Findings

Unclear statement at docs/prs/2026-10-13-PR#100-werkregie-doc-glob.md:20, severity unknown, counted as medium

hint; Jev: real 0.71, severity 1.1 of 3

Line 20 says "The machine config of werkregie on mih09 gets the changed host config." The term "machine config" is not defined anywhere in the diff or related files, and the passive voice "gets" leaves the deployment action implicit. The intended meaning is presumably that the host config deployed on mih09 receives the same change as config/werkregie.toml in this PR, but a reader unfamiliar with the topology may not. A concrete rephrase would be e.g. "The host config deployed on mih09 receives the same change."

Classifier

5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
1 answer ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.

_{Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 15659, calls 1, tokens in 15099 / out 7428 (reasoning included in out), duration 118.1 s, cost 0.0134 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3333, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 1046, cost 0.0000 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 1039 / out 612, cost 0.0010 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 5098, cost 0.0002 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2216, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.4 s, change_summary 5.7 s, doc_check 0.5 s, context 0.3 s, model_review 109.9 s, finding_judge 0.3 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main df376a0).

Reviewed head `825c477956bd8486a8dfb69d319a78b931e15ae4` against base `df376a0b06d13fc56e6d065d00623e6ac6aa9ccf`, werkrevisor 0.40.1.}

## 🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS Change kind: `mixed`. ### Reasons - **hint** approval of werkrevisor for `d5e31f1` not carried over: 1 approved block(s) are missing - **hint** 3 changed file(s) that neither weaken the checks nor touch security according to Jev - **hint** 1 build change(s) of low risk according to Jev: statistics/build.gradle.kts (weakens checks 0.02, risk 0.00, security 0.01) - **hint** 5 section(s) of the PR document agree with the change summary of openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 according to Jev - **hint** 1 finding(s) of low severity or rated minor by Jev: docs/prs/2026-10-13-PR#100-werkregie-doc-glob.md:20 ### Findings 1. **Unclear statement** at `docs/prs/2026-10-13-PR#100-werkregie-doc-glob.md:20`, severity unknown, counted as medium hint; Jev: real 0.71, severity 1.1 of 3 Line 20 says "The machine config of werkregie on mih09 gets the changed host config." The term "machine config" is not defined anywhere in the diff or related files, and the passive voice "gets" leaves the deployment action implicit. The intended meaning is presumably that the host config deployed on mih09 receives the same change as config/werkregie.toml in this PR, but a reader unfamiliar with the topology may not. A concrete rephrase would be e.g. "The host config deployed on mih09 receives the same change." ### Classifier 5 of 5 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)). 1 answer ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence. Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 15659, calls 1, tokens in 15099 / out 7428 (reasoning included in out), duration 118.1 s, cost 0.0134 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 3333, cost 0.0001 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 1046, cost 0.0000 USD, change summary `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3` via Minimax calls 1, tokens in 1039 / out 612, cost 0.0010 USD (reported), PR document check `jev-1.13.0` calls 5, tokens in 5098, cost 0.0002 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 4, tokens in 2216, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.4 s, change_summary 5.7 s, doc_check 0.5 s, context 0.3 s, model_review 109.9 s, finding_judge 0.3 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main df376a0). Reviewed head `825c477956bd8486a8dfb69d319a78b931e15ae4` against base `df376a0b06d13fc56e6d065d00623e6ac6aa9ccf`, werkrevisor 0.40.1.

ai-reviewer approved these changes

2026-10-13 08:53:28 +02:00

ai-reviewer left a comment

werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for 825c477956bd8486a8dfb69d319a78b931e15ae4.
The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.

werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for `825c477956bd8486a8dfb69d319a78b931e15ae4`. The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.

ai-reviewer scheduled this pull request to auto merge when all checks succeed 2026-10-13 08:53:29 +02:00

ai-reviewer merged commit 5d559f3e65 into main

2026-10-13 08:53:32 +02:00

ai-reviewer deleted branch claude-code/werkregie-doc-glob

2026-10-13 08:53:32 +02:00

claude-code commented

2026-10-13 08:53:56 +02:00

Not changed: "machine config" is the term of the README, section "Machine config": the .git/werkator/.werkator.yml of a repository on the Werkator host, which holds the host config inline. It gets the change after the merge.

Not changed: "machine config" is the term of the README, section "Machine config": the `.git/werkator/.werkator.yml` of a repository on the Werkator host, which holds the host config inline. It gets the change after the merge.

Sign in to join this conversation.

2 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: mi/werkrevisor#100