# PR#66: The Shared Workflow Names the Codex Gate

> **WARNING:** This document describes only the change applied in this PR.
> It may already be outdated once the next PR is merged.
> Historic PR documentation is not maintained along with new PRs; treat it as a snapshot.

## Related Links

- [werkrevisor PR#88](https://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/88): the Codex runner and `[codex] mode`.
- [werkrevisor PR#104](https://git.javagil.de/mi/werkrevisor/pulls/104)
  and [werkator PR#158](https://git.javagil.de/mi/werkator/pulls/158): `gate` in both repositories.

## Problem

Since 2026-10-14 werkrevisor and Werkator require the status `ai-review/codex` of the Codex review.
The shared workflow names only werkrevisor as the review agent.
An agent does not learn that a Codex line comment holds the merge, as a line comment of werkrevisor does,
and the human does not learn when an approval counts for the Codex gate.

## Non-Goals

- No `gate` for werkregie; a repository chooses it in its `.werkrevisor.toml`.
- The copies in the other repositories follow with their next PR.

## Solution

- `doc/agentic-workflow.md`, "Review Rounds": the Codex review, its line comments and its status.
- `doc/agentic-workflow.md`, "For the Human": an approval counts for the Codex gate only after the Codex comment.
- Werkbaum: a node below `#ops.workflow`.
- Version 0.41.1.

## Open Questions

None.