Pull requests sorted by the user's next step #17
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: mi/werkregie#17
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Offene PRs nach dem nächsten Handgriff des Menschen sortiert; „Mergen“ auch für Agenten-PRs.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for
6f4568d, superseded by the result for353fbac🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
Findings
doc/werkregie.werkbaum:101-108, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line commentClassifier
9 of 9 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 41296, calls 1, tokens in 40019 / out 14369 (reasoning included in out), duration 122.6 s, cost 0.0292 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 9, tokens in 7240, cost 0.0003 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 2498, cost 0.0001 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 6, tokens in 9029, cost 0.0004 USD, phases: path_judge 0.5 s, classifier 0.6 s, context 0.3 s, model_review 120.4 s, finding_judge 0.2 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main2 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
d32fee3).Reviewed head `6f4568dcd978ac5ac4df9b44ac879b291dd663c1` against base `d32fee3379f6e9ec09e6729db8ed614511ef0c7b`, werkrevisor 0.32.7.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
6f4568dcd978ac5ac4df9b44ac879b291dd663c1.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
Outdated Marker Description, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.84, severity 1.5 of 3
The descriptive text for node #dash.flags (lines after the second
---separator) still states "Mergen (the user's own pull request approved by another human)". Since this PR also gives the Mergen marker to a foreign pull request approved by anyone but its author with all checks green and no scheduled automerge, that summary is now incomplete. The PR updates the Werkbaum tree (adds #dash.merge and #dash.order) but leaves the #dash.flags explanation unchanged, so the prose contradicts the new behaviour.fixed in
353fbacNew commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for
353fbac, superseded by the result forf0958e8🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
6f4568d: dashboard/src/main/kotlin/de/hoennig/werkregie/dashboard/sources/GiteaSource.kt:81Findings
dashboard/src/main/kotlin/de/hoennig/werkregie/dashboard/sources/GiteaSource.kt:81, hint, as a line commentClassifier
9 of 9 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 42147, calls 1, tokens in 40820 / out 28996 (reasoning included in out), duration 243.1 s, cost 0.0470 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 9, tokens in 7240, cost 0.0003 USD, finding judge `none` calls 0, tokens in 0, cost 0.0000 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 1643, cost 0.0001 USD, phases: path_judge 0.2 s, classifier 0.7 s, context 0.4 s, model_review 241.4 s, finding_judge 0.0 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main2 answers ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
d32fee3).Reviewed head `353fbac59d1704954e6d5bd67a03749a8bf46b9c` against base `d32fee3379f6e9ec09e6729db8ed614511ef0c7b`, werkrevisor 0.32.7.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
353fbac59d1704954e6d5bd67a03749a8bf46b9c.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
@@ -78,2 +78,4 @@val reviews = if (draft || sha == null) emptyList() elserunCatching { http.get("$api/repos/$repo/pulls/$number/reviews", headers).toList() }.getOrDefault(emptyList())val approvers = reviews.filter { it.isApprovalOf(sha) }.mapNotNull { it["user"]?.text("login") }// only a pull request that could be merged needs the look at its timeline[low] Comment typo (werkrevisor)
hint
The newly added comment "only a pull request that could be merged needs the look at its timeline" is grammatically wrong ("the look" should be "a look" or "to look"). Cosmetic, no functional impact.
fixed in
f0958e8New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
🟢 werkrevisor GREEN for
f0958e8, superseded by the result forbaebabe🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Gate: approved by werkrevisor; merge waits for 1 open hint(s): reply to each line comment and resolve it, then restart the review or push a commit.
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
353fbacnot carried over: 1 approved block(s) are missingFindings
doc/prs/2026-10-11-PR#17-pr-order.md:71-72, severity unknown, counted as medium, hint, as a line commentClassifier
9 of 9 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 42098, calls 1, tokens in 40775 / out 30711 (reasoning included in out), duration 249.1 s, cost 0.0491 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 9, tokens in 7240, cost 0.0003 USD, finding judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 1, tokens in 2198, cost 0.0001 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 6, tokens in 9340, cost 0.0004 USD, phases: path_judge 0.5 s, classifier 0.6 s, context 0.3 s, model_review 246.9 s, finding_judge 0.2 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main1 answer ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
d32fee3).Reviewed head `f0958e8550562c70c0983fc787def99551dd1374` against base `d32fee3379f6e9ec09e6729db8ed614511ef0c7b`, werkrevisor 0.32.7.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
f0958e8550562c70c0983fc787def99551dd1374.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.
@@ -0,0 +68,4 @@##### Verified by- Manual: `prRank` in the browser orders ten example rowsUnclear verification step, severity unknown, counted as medium (werkrevisor)
hint; Jev: real 0.75, severity 1.2 of 3
The manual verification for Scenario#17.03 references "ten example rows"
with labels such as "orange-old", "orange-new", "yellow", "kein" that are
not defined anywhere in the codebase or the document. A reader trying to
reproduce the verification has to guess what makes an "orange-old" row
different from an "orange-new" one (presumably timestamp, but this is not
stated). The ordering principle is clear from the code, so the impact is
limited to the historical PR record.
fixed in
baebabeNew commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
🟢 werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS
Change kind:
mixed.Reasons
f0958e8not carried over: 1 approved block(s) are missingClassifier
9 of 9 units passed all questions (1 PR document(s)).
Usage: model `openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3`, LLM done, tokens counted before the call 42177, calls 1, tokens in 40853 / out 21479 (reasoning included in out), duration 182.3 s, cost 0.0380 USD (reported), classifier `jev-1.13.0` calls 9, tokens in 7240, cost 0.0003 USD, build file judge `jev-1.13.0` calls 6, tokens in 9340, cost 0.0004 USD, phases: path_judge 0.4 s, classifier 0.7 s, context 0.5 s, model_review 180.2 s, config: defaults + host + repository (.werkrevisor.toml at main1 answer ignored because of a confidence below [classifier] min_confidence.
d32fee3).Reviewed head `baebabef926baacfa0ec2be830338b06cecacd65` against base `d32fee3379f6e9ec09e6729db8ed614511ef0c7b`, werkrevisor 0.32.7.
werkrevisor: GREEN / PASS for
baebabef926baacfa0ec2be830338b06cecacd65.The result comment of werkrevisor holds the details.