Release v1.0.0: Werkator

The release after 0.9.21 is 1.0.0, because a product that changes its
name is better off counting from one under it. The release note says as
much, so the jump is not read as a claim about maturity — plan steps 14,
17 and 18 are still open.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
mhoennig
2026-08-31 07:20:42 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent a0241cce0f
commit d5a482bfbe
2 changed files with 5 additions and 3 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ group = "de.hoennig"
// bump at least the patch version for every deployment — and only then, not per commit —
// so the UI footer (BuildProperties), --version and the release notes identify what is
// actually running; a deployment bundles whatever was committed since the last one
version = "0.9.21"
version = "1.0.0"
java {
toolchain {
+4 -2
View File
@@ -7,13 +7,15 @@
<div th:replace="~{fragments :: nav(${view})}"></div>
<div class="panel release-notes">
<h2>v0.9.22 <span class="muted">unreleased</span></h2>
<h2>v1.0.0 <span class="muted">2026-08-31</span></h2>
<ul>
<li>GitTally is now <strong>Werkator</strong>. The old name already belongs to another
product in the git space, so the rename is a precaution and nothing more: what the
build system does, how it is configured, and how it reports to Gitea are unchanged.
In prose it is Werkator, everywhere a machine reads the name it is
<code>werkator</code>.</li>
<code>werkator</code>. The version marks the new name rather than a claim about
maturity: the release after <code>0.9.21</code> is <code>1.0.0</code>, because a
product that changes its name is better off counting from one under it.</li>
<li>The rename reaches the file names an installation depends on. The committed
configuration is <code>.werkator.yml</code>, the machine-specific one
<code>.git/werkator/.werkator.yml</code>, and all state — build results, artifacts,